Bratlid D
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Regionsykehuset i Trondheim, 7006 Trondheim, Norway.
J Perinatol. 2001 Dec;21 Suppl 1:S88-92; discussion S104-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210656.
Treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is usually based on the measurements of total serum bilirubin levels. Based on empirical data, it is generally recommended to start phototherapy at lower levels in low birth weight and very low birth weight infants than in term infants, but no general agreement exists on exact limits. Treatment criteria in preterm infants do not, however, have the same empirical backing as in term infants. The very low and extremely low birth weight infants are more susceptible to bilirubin toxicity. However, bilirubin may function as an antioxidant and enzyme inducer in these infants. Several other different approaches to establish treatment criteria have also been suggested, and a summary of these are presented and discussed. With the exception of measurement of unbound bilirubin, very few of these approaches have been validated in routine clinical settings. However, unbound bilirubin is at present mainly used also as a parameter to be evaluated in relation to total bilirubin values. The present treatment criteria result in a considerable overtreatment particularly of term infants. However, with a more relaxed attitude toward neonatal hyperbilirubinemia by health care professionals, kernicterus is again reported in term infants. Because the basic mechanisms of bilirubin toxicity as well as the relative significance of the maximum serum bilirubin level compared to the duration of hyperbilirubinemia are not known, individual assessment of a newborn infant's tolerance for hyperbilirubinemia is difficult. Major changes in the empirically developed criteria for treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn are therefore not justified in the near future. For term infants, the search for validated criteria for follow-up of jaundiced infants after discharge are therefore more important than revision of existing criteria for phototherapy.
新生儿高胆红素血症的治疗通常基于血清总胆红素水平的测量。根据经验数据,一般建议低出生体重和极低出生体重婴儿开始光疗的胆红素水平低于足月儿,但对于确切界限尚无普遍共识。然而,早产儿的治疗标准不像足月儿那样有相同的经验依据。极低和超低出生体重婴儿更容易受到胆红素毒性的影响。然而,胆红素在这些婴儿中可能起到抗氧化剂和酶诱导剂的作用。还提出了其他几种建立治疗标准的不同方法,并对这些方法进行了总结和讨论。除了测量未结合胆红素外,这些方法中很少有在常规临床环境中得到验证的。然而,目前未结合胆红素也主要用作与总胆红素值相关的评估参数。目前的治疗标准导致了相当多的过度治疗,尤其是对足月儿。然而,由于医护人员对新生儿高胆红素血症的态度更加宽松,足月儿中再次出现了核黄疸的报道。由于胆红素毒性的基本机制以及与高胆红素血症持续时间相比最大血清胆红素水平的相对重要性尚不清楚,因此很难对新生儿对高胆红素血症的耐受性进行个体评估。因此,在不久的将来,对基于经验制定的新生儿高胆红素血症治疗标准进行重大改变是不合理的。对于足月儿来说,寻找出院后黄疸婴儿随访的有效标准比修订现有的光疗标准更为重要。