Kallner S, Wittgren H B
Department of Biology, Linköping University, Sweden.
Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(11-12):237-44.
The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the fate of nitrogen (N) in two Swedish wastewater treatment wetlands in the cities of Oxelösund and Hässleholm. Specifically, we wanted to see if a fairly simple model, developed with regard to common data availability, could satisfactorily describe the concentration dynamics at the outlet from the wetlands. A first-order area-based model, with two alternative expressions for temperature dependence, was set up to describe three major processes: ammonification, nitrification and denitrification. The N concentration dynamics at the outlet of the Oxelösund wetland was not satisfactorily described, R2(NH4+-N) = 0.33 and R2(NO3(-)-N) = 0.10, while the modelled concentrations corresponded quite well with measured concentrations in the Hässleholm wetland, R2(NH4+-N) = 0.83 and R2(NO3(-)-N) = 0.58. The NO3(-)-N concentrations, in both wetlands, could be slightly better described when introducing a temperature coefficient as an additional free parameter. The explained variances reported above were achieved when the model was calibrated individually for the two wetlands, when the resulting (optimised) reaction rate coefficients for each of the three processes were quite different between the two wetlands. To improve model performance, the rate equations may have to be changed to include factors in addition to concentration and temperature, such as dissolved oxygen and hydraulic efficiency. It may also be important to include other processes, such as plant uptake/decay and ammonia volatilisation.
本研究的目的是描述和比较瑞典厄勒布鲁市和哈瑟勒霍尔姆市两个污水处理湿地中氮(N)的去向。具体而言,我们想看看一个基于常见数据可用性开发的相当简单的模型是否能够令人满意地描述湿地出水口的浓度动态变化。我们建立了一个基于面积的一阶模型,该模型有两种温度依赖性的替代表达式,用于描述氨化、硝化和反硝化这三个主要过程。厄勒布鲁湿地出水口的氮浓度动态变化未能得到令人满意的描述,R2(NH4+-N) = 0.33,R2(NO3(-)-N) = 0.10,而模型浓度与哈瑟勒霍尔姆湿地的实测浓度相当吻合,R2(NH4+-N) = 0.83,R2(NO3(-)-N) = 0.58。当引入温度系数作为一个额外的自由参数时,两个湿地中的NO3(-)-N浓度都能得到稍好一些的描述。当针对两个湿地分别对模型进行校准时,上述解释方差得以实现,此时两个湿地中三个过程各自得到的(优化后的)反应速率系数差异很大。为了提高模型性能,可能必须改变速率方程,以纳入除浓度和温度之外的其他因素,如溶解氧和水力效率。纳入其他过程,如植物吸收/腐烂和氨挥发,可能也很重要。