Eckstein M
University of Southern California School of Medicine, USA.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001 Dec;7(6):450-4. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200112000-00013.
Despite years of research on the resuscitation of the patient with critical traumatic injuries, controversy remains surrounding the criteria to waive initiation of resuscitation in the pre-hospital setting or to terminate such efforts in the emergency department. The decision to initiate or continue resuscitation on moribund trauma patients is associated with considerable costs. Ambulance transport using lights and sirens carries potential risk. Emergency department thoracotomy, with exposure to high risk bodily fluids, involvement of numerous staff, and usage precious blood products, is a procedure that has fewer and fewer indications. This review presents guidelines to help determine when to initiate resuscitation for the critically injured trauma patient and when to cease these efforts in the emergency department. Since there are economic, societal, and ethical implications, each system should establish their own criteria, using these guidelines as a basis.
尽管多年来一直在研究对严重创伤患者的复苏,但对于在院前环境中放弃启动复苏或在急诊科终止复苏努力的标准,仍存在争议。对濒死创伤患者启动或继续复苏的决定会带来相当高的成本。使用警灯和警报器的救护车运输存在潜在风险。急诊科开胸手术会接触到高风险体液,涉及众多工作人员,并消耗宝贵的血液制品,其适应症越来越少。本综述提出了一些指导原则,以帮助确定何时对重伤创伤患者启动复苏以及何时在急诊科停止这些努力。由于存在经济、社会和伦理影响,每个系统都应以这些指导原则为基础,建立自己的标准。