Xie Wen, Mertens Joachim C, Reiss Daniel J, Rimm David L, Camp Robert L, Haffty Bruce G, Reiss Michael
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.
Cancer Res. 2002 Jan 15;62(2):497-505.
Based largely on studies of cell lines in vitro and of transgenic mouse models, disruptions of transforming growth factor (TGF) beta signaling are thought to contribute to the development and progression of human breast cancer. However, whether and how TGF-beta signaling becomes disrupted during human breast cancer development in vivo remains largely unknown. To address this question, we have compared the patterns of expression and activation of the postreceptor components of the TGF-beta signaling pathway, the so-called Smads, in human breast cancer cell lines with those in breast carcinoma specimens. None of the breast carcinoma cell lines were growth arrested by TGF-beta in vitro. Each of the tumor cell lines expressed normal levels of Smad2 and -3. Moreover, TGF-beta treatment induced phosphorylation of Smad2 (Smad2P) in each of these lines, except those that lacked TGF-beta type II receptors. Moreover, only one of the cell lines failed to express Smad4. Among 456 cases of human breast carcinoma assembled in tissue microarrays, the majority (92%) expressed Smad2, Smad2P, as well as Smad4, indicating their ability to proliferate within a microenvironment that contains bioactive TGF-beta. Thirty cases (6.6%) failed to express Smad2P, suggesting the loss of TGF-beta receptor signaling. Nine cases (2%) failed to express Smad4, and 3 of these also failed to express Smad2P. Thus, the phenotypes of breast tumors in vivo paralleled that of human breast cancer cell lines in terms of Smad2P and Smad4 expression. Loss of Smad signaling was not associated with any particular histological subtype, histological or nuclear grade, estrogen- or progesterone receptor expression, or HER2/neu expression. Loss of Smad4 was inversely correlated with the presence of axillary lymph node metastases. Most importantly, among patients with stage II breast cancer, lack of Smad2P expression in the tumor was strongly associated with shorter overall survival. Finally, analysis of a small cohort of hereditary breast cancers failed to reveal any association between BRCA1 or BRCA2 genotype and alterations in Smad signaling.
主要基于体外细胞系和转基因小鼠模型的研究,转化生长因子(TGF)β信号通路的破坏被认为与人类乳腺癌的发生和发展有关。然而,在人类乳腺癌体内发生过程中TGF-β信号通路是否以及如何被破坏,在很大程度上仍然未知。为了解决这个问题,我们比较了TGF-β信号通路受体后成分(即所谓的Smads)在人类乳腺癌细胞系和乳腺癌标本中的表达和激活模式。在体外,没有一种乳腺癌细胞系被TGF-β诱导生长停滞。每个肿瘤细胞系都表达正常水平的Smad2和Smad3。此外,TGF-β处理在每个细胞系中均诱导了Smad2的磷酸化(Smad2P),除了那些缺乏TGF-βⅡ型受体的细胞系。此外,只有一个细胞系未表达Smad4。在组织微阵列中收集的456例人类乳腺癌病例中,大多数(92%)表达Smad2、Smad2P以及Smad4,表明它们在含有生物活性TGF-β的微环境中具有增殖能力。30例(6.6%)未表达Smad2P,提示TGF-β受体信号通路丧失。9例(2%)未表达Smad4,其中3例也未表达Smad2P。因此,就Smad2P和Smad4表达而言,体内乳腺肿瘤的表型与人类乳腺癌细胞系的表型相似。Smad信号通路的丧失与任何特定的组织学亚型、组织学或核分级、雌激素或孕激素受体表达或HER2/neu表达均无关。Smad4的缺失与腋窝淋巴结转移的存在呈负相关。最重要的是,在Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者中,肿瘤中缺乏Smad2P表达与较短的总生存期密切相关。最后,对一小群遗传性乳腺癌的分析未能揭示BRCA1或BRCA2基因型与Smad信号通路改变之间的任何关联。