[盆底肌治疗尿失禁]
[Physiotherapy of pelvic floor for incontinence].
作者信息
Galeri S, Sottini C
机构信息
U.O. di Fisiatria, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia.
出版信息
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2001 Sep;73(3):143-6.
UNLABELLED
The rate of urinary incontinence after prostatectomy, as reported in several studies, varies between 0 and 88%. In the last years, pelvic floor rehabilitation in the women stress incontinence has been strengthened, with a great amount of clinical studies and results. Recently, the rehabilitation treatment has been studied in men who underwent a radical prostatectomy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews recently published the "Conservative management for post prostatectomy incontinence". The aim of this study was to determine the effects of conservative management in post prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Randomized or almost-randomized trials were analyzed up to January 1999; five studies were included, with the following results: 1. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no active treatment. Two trials compared pelvic floor muscle training with patients in a control group. In both groups there was a clinical improvement, especially in the first months after prostatectomy. The results of the two studies suggest a benefit in the treated group, even if not statistically significant, mainly in the first months after surgery. 2. Pelvic floor muscle training + biofeedback versus no active treatment. The treated group regained continence in shorter time, with decrease of incontinence episodes, of urinary frequency, of the quantity of urine loss; these data were not statistically significant. 3. Pelvic floor muscle training + rectal electrical stimulation versus no active treatment No detectable differences among the two groups, either in number of men still incontinent, and in Pad-test results. 4. Pelvic floor muscle training + rectal electrical stimulation + biofeedback versus no active treatment. Pad-test evaluation was similar in the treated and in the control group; no other outcomes were described. 5. Pelvic floor muscle training + rectal electrical stimulation versus pelvic floor muscle training. There was a progressive improvement in three months of rehabilitation, even if not statistically significant. All the studies showed improvement of urinary incontinence in men, independent of their trial allocation (treatment or control group). After an initial period of rapid improvement, continence improves even after the first three months, so that only 15-20% was still incontinent by six to twelve months.
IN CONCLUSION
in the post-operative period, a supportive and educative approach is recommended to reduce the duration and the degree of urinary incontinence. Spontaneous recovering occurs particularly in the first three months: it is maintainable a delayed rehabilitation management, with intensive rehabilitation treatment for men with persistent urinary incontinence. Rehabilitation seems to be more effective in the first four months after surgery. Even the AHCPR Guideline recommends a behavioural, rehabilitative and pharmacological treatment. Research must be improved. Limits of the studies are: small sample sizes, incomplete randomisation--necessary to avoid sample "contamination"--, definition of the best timing for treatment; trials could be restricted to men with persistent urinary incontinence, or could compare early treatment with delayed more selective treatment. This management is intensive and resource-dependent; it may be difficult to justify it, unless it proves evidently effective. In our clinical-therapeutical experience, patients undergo a physiatrist examination within 10 days after catheter removal. The clinical examination includes: full history, self-evaluation questionnaire, strength (PC test: 0-5 by digital anal control), perianal sensibility, anal sphincter tone, presence of muscle synergies. The rehabilitation team immediately enrolls the patient, with an educative-behavioural and rehabilitative approach: men are asked to fill a voiding diary, and have a bladder training and a first pelvic floor muscle training, with written instructions. Patients must know and share the therapeutical project. A second clinical evaluation occurs after three months: if urinary incontinence persists, the patient is submitted to complete rehabilitation: *Urinary incontinence + absence of muscle contraction (PC = 0/1): pelvic floor muscle training and rectal electrical stimulation; *Urinary incontinence with PC test > 1: pelvic floor muscle training and even biofeedback (for those with poor self muscle consciousness). Frequency of treatment: 2-3 times a week. The aim of the treatment is to enable consciousness of pelvic muscles and to strengthen perineal function.
未标注
多项研究报告显示,前列腺切除术后尿失禁发生率在0%至88%之间。近年来,女性压力性尿失禁的盆底康复得到加强,有大量临床研究及成果。最近,针对接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性患者开展了康复治疗研究。Cochrane系统评价数据库最近发表了《前列腺切除术后尿失禁的保守治疗》。本研究旨在确定保守治疗对前列腺切除术后尿失禁的效果。对截至1999年1月的随机或近乎随机试验进行分析;纳入了五项研究,结果如下:1. 盆底肌肉训练与无积极治疗对比。两项试验将盆底肌肉训练与对照组患者进行比较。两组均有临床改善,尤其是在前列腺切除术后的最初几个月。两项研究结果表明,治疗组有获益,即便无统计学意义,主要在术后最初几个月。2. 盆底肌肉训练+生物反馈与无积极治疗对比。治疗组在更短时间内恢复控尿,尿失禁发作次数、尿频及尿量减少;这些数据无统计学意义。3. 盆底肌肉训练+直肠电刺激与无积极治疗对比。两组在仍有尿失禁的男性数量及尿垫试验结果方面均未发现可检测到的差异。4. 盆底肌肉训练+直肠电刺激+生物反馈与无积极治疗对比。治疗组和对照组的尿垫试验评估相似;未描述其他结果。5. 盆底肌肉训练+直肠电刺激与盆底肌肉训练对比。康复三个月时有渐进性改善,即便无统计学意义。所有研究均显示男性尿失禁有改善,与试验分组(治疗组或对照组)无关。在最初快速改善期后,甚至在最初三个月后控尿仍有改善,因此到六至十二个月时只有15%至20%的患者仍有尿失禁。
结论
在术后阶段,建议采用支持性和教育性方法以减少尿失禁的持续时间和程度。尤其在最初三个月会出现自然恢复:对于持续性尿失禁的男性可维持延迟康复管理并进行强化康复治疗。康复似乎在术后头四个月更有效。甚至美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)指南也推荐行为、康复及药物治疗。研究有待改进。研究的局限性在于:样本量小、随机化不完整(这对于避免样本“污染”很必要)、治疗最佳时机的定义;试验可能仅限于持续性尿失禁的男性,或者可比较早期治疗与延迟的更具选择性的治疗。这种管理强度大且依赖资源;除非证明明显有效,否则可能难以证明其合理性。根据我们的临床治疗经验,患者在拔除导尿管后10天内接受物理治疗师检查。临床检查包括:完整病史、自我评估问卷、肌力(盆底肌测试:通过指诊肛门控制为0至5级)、肛周感觉、肛门括约肌张力、肌肉协同作用情况。康复团队立即让患者加入,采用教育行为和康复方法:要求男性填写排尿日记,并进行膀胱训练及首次盆底肌肉训练,提供书面指导。患者必须了解并认同治疗方案。三个月后进行第二次临床评估:如果尿失禁持续存在,患者接受全面康复治疗:*尿失禁且无肌肉收缩(盆底肌测试=0/1):盆底肌肉训练和直肠电刺激;*尿失禁且盆底肌测试>1:盆底肌肉训练甚至生物反馈(针对自我肌肉意识差的患者)。治疗频率:每周2至3次。治疗目的是使患者意识到盆底肌肉并增强会阴功能。