Latham P, Tappeiner J
Oregon State University, Southern Oregon Experiment Station, 569 Hanley Rd., Central Point, OR 97502, USA.
Tree Physiol. 2002 Feb;22(2-3):137-46. doi: 10.1093/treephys/22.2-3.137.
The positive growth response of healthy young trees to density reduction is well known. In contrast, large old trees are usually thought to be intrinsically limited in their ability to respond to increased growing space; therefore, density reduction is seldom used in stands of old-growth trees. We tested the null hypothesis that old-growth trees are incapable of responding with increased growth following density reduction. The diameter growth response of 271 Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana Dougl.) trees ranging in age from 158 to 650 years was examined 20 to 50 years after density reduction. Density reduction involved either light thinning with removal of less vigorous trees, or shelterwood treatments in which overstory trees were not removed. Ratios of basal area growth after treatment to basal area growth before treatment, and several other measures of growth, all indicated that the old trees sometimes benefited and were not harmed by density reduction. Growth increased by 10% or more for 68% of the trees in treated stands, and nearly 30% of trees increased growth by over 50%. This growth response persisted for at least 20 years. During this 20-year period, only three trees in treated stands (1.5%) exhibited a rapid decrease in growth, whereas growth decreased in 64% of trees in untreated stands. The length of time before a growth response to density reduction occurred varied from 5 to 25 years, with the greatest growth response often occurring 20 to 25 years after treatment. These results have important implications both for the basic biology of aging in woody plants as well as for silvicultural practices in forests with old-growth trees.
健康的幼树对降低种植密度呈现出积极的生长响应,这是众所周知的。相比之下,大型老树通常被认为在应对生长空间增加方面的能力存在内在限制;因此,降低密度很少用于老龄林分。我们检验了零假设,即老龄树在密度降低后无法通过增加生长来做出响应。在降低密度20至50年后,研究了271棵花旗松(Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco)、黄松(Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws)和糖松(Pinus lambertiana Dougl.)的直径生长响应,这些树的树龄在158至650年之间。降低密度的方法包括轻度疏伐,即移除生长较弱的树木,或进行庇护木处理,即不移除上层树木。处理后与处理前的断面积生长比率以及其他几个生长指标均表明,老树有时会从降低密度中受益且未受到损害。处理林分中68%的树木生长增加了10%或更多,近30%的树木生长增加超过50%。这种生长响应至少持续了20年。在这20年期间,处理林分中只有三棵树(1.5%)生长迅速下降,而未处理林分中有64%的树木生长下降。对密度降低产生生长响应之前的时间长度从5年到25年不等,最大的生长响应通常出现在处理后20至25年。这些结果对于木本植物衰老的基础生物学以及老龄林森林的造林实践都具有重要意义。