Schuurs A H, Davidson C L
Vakgroep Cariologie en Endodontologie, Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1994 Dec;101(12):470-4.
Opponents of the use of dental amalgam fillings often hold specific views on health and illness. Their doubts about the safety of amalgam are based upon unproven theories and results obtained with invalidated diagnostic methods and case-histories. It is contended here that case-histories cannot be accepted as scientific evidence and do not warrant over-simplified and idle, yet threatening statements. Almost superfluously, the improbability (not identical to impossibility!) of toxic symptoms and the rare manifestation of allergic reactions are summarized, prior to the description of some measures to diminish the release of mercury from amalgam restorations. Guidelines are presented how to deal with patients with health complaints attributed by them to amalgam.
反对使用汞合金补牙材料的人往往对健康和疾病持有特定观点。他们对汞合金安全性的怀疑基于未经证实的理论以及通过无效诊断方法和病例史获得的结果。本文认为病例史不能被视为科学证据,也不应支持那些过度简化、毫无根据却又危言耸听的言论。在描述一些减少汞合金修复体中汞释放的措施之前,几乎是多余地总结了出现中毒症状的不可能性(并非等同于不可能!)以及过敏反应的罕见表现。文中还给出了如何应对那些将自身健康问题归咎于汞合金的患者的指导方针。