Hannon J P, Tigani B, Wolber C, Williams I, Mazzoni L, Howes C, Fozard J R
Research Department, Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Br J Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;135(3):685-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704516.
The bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine is markedly and selectively increased following ovalbumin (OA) challenge in actively sensitized, Brown Norway rats. We present a pharmacological analysis of the receptor mediating this response. Like adenosine, the broad-spectrum adenosine receptor agonist, NECA, induced dose-related bronchoconstriction in actively sensitized, OA-challenged animals. In contrast, CPA, CGS 21680 and 2-Cl-IB-MECA, agonists selective for A(1) A(2A) and A(3) receptors, respectively, induced no, or minimal, bronchoconstriction. Neither the selective A(1) receptor antagonist, DPCPX, nor the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist, ZM 241385, blocked the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine. MRS 1754, which has similar affinity for rat A(2B) and A(1) receptors, failed to block the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine despite blockade of the A(1) receptor-mediated bradycardia induced by NECA. 8-SPT and CGS 15943, antagonists at A(1), A(2A), and A(2B) but not A(3) receptors, inhibited the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine. However, the degree of blockade (approximately 3 fold) did not reflect the plasma concentrations, which were 139 and 21 times greater than the K(B) value at the rat A(2B) receptor, respectively. Adenosine and NECA, but not CPA, CGS 21680 or 2-Cl-IB-MECA, induced contraction of parenchymal strip preparations from actively sensitized OA-challenged animals. Responses to adenosine could not be antagonized by 8-SPT or MRS 1754 at concentrations >50 times their affinities at the rat A(2B) receptor. The receptor mediating the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine augmented following allergen challenge in actively sensitized BN rats cannot be categorized as one of the four recognized adenosine receptor subtypes.
在主动致敏的棕色挪威大鼠中,卵清蛋白(OA)激发后,对腺苷的支气管收缩反应显著且选择性增强。我们对介导该反应的受体进行了药理学分析。与腺苷一样,广谱腺苷受体激动剂NECA在主动致敏、OA激发的动物中诱导剂量相关的支气管收缩。相比之下,分别对A(1)、A(2A)和A(3)受体具有选择性的激动剂CPA、CGS 21680和2-Cl-IB-MECA诱导的支气管收缩不明显或极为轻微。选择性A(1)受体拮抗剂DPCPX和选择性A(2A)受体拮抗剂ZM 241385均未阻断对腺苷的支气管收缩反应。对大鼠A(2B)和A(1)受体具有相似亲和力的MRS 1754,尽管阻断了NECA诱导的A(1)受体介导的心动过缓,但未能阻断对腺苷的支气管收缩反应。8-SPT和CGS 15943是A(1)、A(2A)和A(2B)受体而非A(3)受体的拮抗剂,它们抑制了对腺苷的支气管收缩反应。然而,阻断程度(约3倍)并未反映血浆浓度,血浆浓度分别比大鼠A(2B)受体的K(B)值高139倍和21倍。腺苷和NECA可诱导主动致敏、OA激发动物的实质条制备物收缩,而CPA、CGS 21680或2-Cl-IB-MECA则不能。在浓度高于其对大鼠A(2B)受体亲和力50倍时,8-SPT或MRS 1754无法拮抗对腺苷的反应。在主动致敏的BN大鼠中,变应原激发后介导对腺苷支气管收缩反应增强的受体不能归类为四种公认的腺苷受体亚型之一。