Two deaths and two lessons: is it time to review the structure and function of research ethics committees?
作者信息
Savulescu J
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2002 Feb;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.1.1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Two deaths and two lessons: is it time to review the structure and function of research ethics committees?两起死亡事件与两点教训：是时候审视研究伦理委员会的结构与职能了吗？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Feb;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.1.1.
2
Research ethics committees.研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1990 Apr 7;300(6729):943.
3
A system for the ethical control of clinical research.
Public Health. 1980 Jul;94(4):219-22. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(80)80044-8.
4
The composition and function of ethical committees.伦理委员会的组成与职能。
J Med Ethics. 1975 Apr;1(1):23-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.1.1.23.
5
The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?医学研究的伦理与治理：监管与道德有何关系？
New Rev Bioeth. 2003 Nov;1(1):41-58. doi: 10.1080/1740028032000131413.
6
Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.人体研究：澳大利亚伦理委员会采取试探性措施。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Jun;9(2):66-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.2.66.
7
Research ethics committees and military defence.研究伦理委员会与军事防御。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 May-Jun;28(3):237-41.
8
Too many ethical committees.伦理委员会过多。
BMJ. 1991 Jan 19;302(6769):180.
9
The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee.机构审查委员会：一个不断发展的伦理委员会。
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Winter;3(4):278-82.
10
Health science research ethics: a critique.健康科学研究伦理：一项批判。
Health Law Can. 1993;13(3):192-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk - a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members.风险分级研究方法：一项横断面研究，旨在确定研究伦理委员会成员的意见。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 1;12(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02295-1.
2
Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing in Support of Public Health.基于废水的测试的结构化伦理审查，以支持公共卫生。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 5;57(35):12969-12980. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04529. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing.基于废水检测的结构化伦理审查
medRxiv. 2023 Jun 14:2023.06.12.23291231. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.12.23291231.
4
A Preliminary Study to Explore the Informed Consent Approach and the Ethical Challenges in the Malaysian Biobanking for Research.一项探索马来西亚生物样本库研究中的知情同意方法及伦理挑战的初步研究。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Nov 8;15(2):141-154. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00229-y. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue.促进健康数据的道德使用以造福社会：电子健康记录、同意与易救援义务
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0130.
6
Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent?机构审查委员会委员：他们是谁，他们做什么，以及他们代表谁？
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):975-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182578b54.
7
In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees.身处险境？与研究伦理委员会互动的经验。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr;38(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100124. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Legitimate requests and indecent proposals: matters of justice in the ethical assessment of phase I trials involving competent patients.合理请求与不当提议：涉及有行为能力患者的I期试验伦理评估中的公正问题
J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):205-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006684.
9
Thalassaemia major: the murky story of deferiprone.重型地中海贫血：去铁酮的隐晦故事。
BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):358-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.358.
10
United Kingdom research governance strategy.英国研究治理战略。
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):553-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.553.
Zotero 插件