Richardson Carolyn A, Snijders Chris J, Hides Julie A, Damen Léonie, Pas Martijn S, Storm Joop
Institute of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Feb 15;27(4):399-405. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015.
Two abdominal muscle patterns were tested in the same group of individuals, and their effects were compared in relation to sacroiliac joint laxity. One pattern was contraction of the transversus abdominis, independently of the other abdominals; the other was a bracing action that used all the lateral abdominal muscles.
To demonstrate the biomechanical effect of the exercise for the transversus abdominis known to be effective in low back pain.
Drawing in the abdominal wall is a specific exercise for the transversus abdominis muscle (in cocontraction with the multifidus), which is used in the treatment of back pain. Clinical effectiveness has been demonstrated to be a reduction of 3-year recurrence from 75% to 35%. To the authors' best knowledge, there is not yet in vivo proof of the biomechanical effect of this specific exercise. This study of a biomechanical model on the mechanics of the sacroiliac joint, however, predicted a significant effect of transversus abdominis muscle force.
Thirteen healthy individuals who could perform the test patterns were included. Sacroiliac joint laxity values were recorded with study participants in the prone position during the two abdominal muscle patterns. The values were recorded by means of Doppler imaging of vibrations. Simultaneous electromyographic recordings and ultrasound imaging were used to verify the two muscle patterns.
The range of sacroiliac joint laxity values observed in this study was comparable with levels found in earlier studies of healthy individuals. These values decreased significantly in all individuals during both muscle patterns (P < 0.001). The independent transversus abdominis contraction decreased sacroiliac joint laxity (or rather increased sacroiliac joint stiffness) to a significantly greater degree than the general abdominal exercise pattern (P < 0.0260).
Contraction of the transversus abdominis significantly decreases the laxity of the sacroiliac joint. This decrease in laxity is larger than that caused by a bracing action using all the lateral abdominal muscles. These findings are in line with the authors' biomechanical model predictions and support the use of independent transversus abdominis contractions for the treatment of low back pain.
在同一组个体中测试了两种腹部肌肉模式,并比较了它们对骶髂关节松弛度的影响。一种模式是腹横肌收缩,与其他腹部肌肉无关;另一种是使用所有侧腹部肌肉的支撑动作。
证明已知对下背痛有效的腹横肌锻炼的生物力学效应。
收腹是腹横肌的一种特定锻炼方式(与多裂肌协同收缩),用于治疗背痛。临床有效性已被证明可将3年复发率从75%降至35%。据作者所知,尚未有该特定锻炼生物力学效应的体内证据。然而,这项关于骶髂关节力学的生物力学模型研究预测了腹横肌力量的显著效应。
纳入13名能够执行测试模式的健康个体。在两种腹部肌肉模式下,让研究参与者处于俯卧位时记录骶髂关节松弛度值。这些值通过振动的多普勒成像记录。同时使用肌电图记录和超声成像来验证这两种肌肉模式。
本研究中观察到的骶髂关节松弛度值范围与早期对健康个体的研究中发现的水平相当。在两种肌肉模式下,所有个体的这些值均显著降低(P < 0.001)。独立的腹横肌收缩比一般的腹部锻炼模式更显著地降低了骶髂关节松弛度(或者说增加了骶髂关节刚度)(P < 0.0260)。
腹横肌收缩显著降低骶髂关节的松弛度。这种松弛度的降低比使用所有侧腹部肌肉的支撑动作所导致的更大。这些发现与作者的生物力学模型预测一致,并支持使用独立的腹横肌收缩来治疗下背痛。