Schrage William G, Woodman Christopher R, Laughlin M Harold
Department of Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Mar;92(3):901-11. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00642.2001.
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endothelium-dependent dilation (flow-induced dilation and ACh-induced dilation) in rat soleus muscle arterioles is impaired by hindlimb unweighting (HLU). Male Sprague-Dawley rats (approximately 300 g) were exposed to HLU or weight-bearing control (Con) conditions for 14 days. Soleus first-order (1A) and second-order (2A) arterioles were isolated, cannulated, and exposed to step increases in luminal flow at constant pressure. Flow-induced dilation was not impaired by HLU in 1A or 2A arterioles. The cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (Indo; 50 microM) did not alter flow-induced dilation in 1As or 2As. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; 300 microM) reduced flow-induced dilation by 65-70% in Con and HLU 1As. In contrast, L-NNA abolished flow-induced dilation in 2As from Con rats but had no effect in HLU 2As. Combined treatment with L-NNA + Indo reduced tone in 1As and 2As from Con rats, but flow-induced dilation in the presence of L-NNA + Indo was not different from responses without inhibitors in either Con or HLU 1As or 2As. HLU also did not impair ACh-induced dilation (10(-9)-10(-4) M) in soleus 2As. L-NNA reduced ACh-induced dilation by approximately 40% in Con 2As but abolished dilation in HLU 2As. Indo did not alter ACh-induced dilation in Con or HLU 2As, whereas combined treatment with L-NNA + Indo abolished ACh-induced dilation in 2As from both groups. We conclude that flow-induced dilation (1As and 2As) was preserved after 2 wk HLU, but HLU decreased the contribution of NOS in mediating flow-induced dilation and increased the contribution of a NOS- and cyclooxygenase-independent mechanism (possibly endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor). In soleus 2As, ACh-induced dilation was preserved after 2-wk HLU but the contribution of NOS in mediating ACh-induced dilation was increased.
后肢去负荷(HLU)会损害大鼠比目鱼肌小动脉的内皮依赖性舒张(血流诱导的舒张和乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张)。将雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠(约300克)置于HLU或负重对照(Con)条件下14天。分离比目鱼肌的一级(1A)和二级(2A)小动脉,插管,并在恒定压力下使其管腔血流逐步增加。HLU并未损害1A或2A小动脉的血流诱导舒张。环氧化酶抑制剂吲哚美辛(Indo;50微摩尔)未改变1A或2A小动脉的血流诱导舒张。用N(ω)-硝基-L-精氨酸(L-NNA;300微摩尔)抑制一氧化氮合酶(NOS)使Con组和HLU组1A小动脉的血流诱导舒张降低65%-70%。相比之下,L-NNA消除了Con组大鼠2A小动脉的血流诱导舒张,但对HLU组2A小动脉无影响。L-NNA + Indo联合处理降低了Con组大鼠1A和2A小动脉的张力,但在L-NNA + Indo存在的情况下,Con组或HLU组1A或2A小动脉的血流诱导舒张与无抑制剂时的反应无差异。HLU也未损害比目鱼肌2A小动脉中乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张(10^(-9)-10^(-4) M)。L-NNA使Con组2A小动脉中乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张降低约40%,但消除了HLU组2A小动脉的舒张。Indo未改变Con组或HLU组2A小动脉中乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张,而L-NNA + Indo联合处理消除了两组2A小动脉中乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张。我们得出结论,2周HLU后血流诱导舒张(1A和2A小动脉)得以保留,但HLU降低了NOS在介导血流诱导舒张中的作用,并增加了一种不依赖NOS和环氧化酶的机制(可能是内皮衍生的超极化因子)的作用。在比目鱼肌2A小动脉中,2周HLU后乙酰胆碱诱导的舒张得以保留,但NOS在介导乙酰胆碱诱导舒张中的作用增加。