Tummala R P, Chu R M, Madison M T, Myers M, Tubman D, Nussbaum E S
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Mail Code 96, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2001 Nov;49(5):1059-66; discussion 1066-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200111000-00007.
Intracranial aneurysm rupture during placement of Guglielmi detachable coils has been reported, but the management and consequences of this event have not been extensively described. We present our experience with this feared complication and report possible neuroradiological and neurosurgical interventions to improve outcomes.
We retrospectively reviewed the records for 701 patients with 734 intracranial aneurysms that were treated with endovascular coiling, during a 6-year period, in the metropolitan Minneapolis-St. Paul (Minnesota) area. This analysis revealed 10 cases of perforation during coiling. The management and outcomes were recorded, and the pertinent literature was reviewed.
All 10 cases involved previously ruptured aneurysms. This complication occurred sporadically and was not observed in the first 100 cases. Perforation occurred during microcatheterization of the aneurysm in two cases and during coil deposition in eight cases. Seven of the perforated aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation and three in the posterior circulation. Six of the 10 patients made good or fair recoveries; all three patients with posterior circulation lesions died immediately after rehemorrhage. Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) was noted for all five patients with intraventricular catheters in place. Bilateral pupil dilation and profound hemodynamic changes were noted for eight patients. Coiling was rapidly completed, and total or nearly total occlusion was achieved in all cases. Emergency ventriculostomy was performed to rapidly reduce increased ICP for two patients, both of whom made good recoveries. Hemodynamic and angiographic factors after perforation, such as prolonged systemic hypertension, persistent dye extravasation after deployment of the first Guglielmi detachable coil, and persistent prolongation of contrast dye transit time (suggesting ongoing ICP elevation), were correlated with poor outcomes.
Previously ruptured aneurysms seem to be more susceptible to endovascular treatment-related perforation than are unruptured lesions. Worse prognoses are associated with iatrogenic rupture during coiling of posterior circulation lesions, compared with those in the anterior circulation. When perforation is recognized, the definitive treatment seems to be reversal of anticoagulation therapy and completion of Guglielmi detachable coil embolization. Immediate neurosurgical intervention is limited in these cases and focuses on decreasing ICP via emergency ventriculostomy. However, these measures may be life-saving, and neurosurgical assistance must be readily available during treatment of these cases.
已有报道称在放置 Guglielmi 可脱性弹簧圈过程中发生颅内动脉瘤破裂,但这一事件的处理方法及后果尚未得到广泛描述。我们介绍了我们在这一可怕并发症方面的经验,并报告了可能改善预后的神经放射学和神经外科干预措施。
我们回顾性分析了明尼阿波利斯 - 圣保罗(明尼苏达州)大都市地区 6 年期间 701 例颅内动脉瘤患者(共 734 个动脉瘤)接受血管内栓塞治疗的记录。该分析发现了 10 例栓塞过程中穿孔的病例。记录了处理方法及结果,并对相关文献进行了回顾。
所有 10 例均涉及既往破裂的动脉瘤。这种并发症偶有发生,在前 100 例中未观察到。2 例穿孔发生在动脉瘤微导管插入过程中,8 例发生在弹簧圈置入过程中。10 个穿孔动脉瘤中,7 个位于前循环,3 个位于后循环。10 例患者中有 6 例恢复良好或尚可;后循环病变的 3 例患者在再出血后立即死亡。所有 5 例置入脑室内导管的患者均出现颅内压(ICP)升高。8 例患者出现双侧瞳孔散大及明显血流动力学改变。弹簧圈栓塞迅速完成,所有病例均实现了完全或几乎完全闭塞。2 例患者因 ICP 升高迅速行急诊脑室造瘘术,均恢复良好。穿孔后的血流动力学和血管造影因素,如持续性系统性高血压、首个 Guglielmi 可脱性弹簧圈置入后持续的造影剂外渗以及造影剂通过时间持续延长(提示 ICP 持续升高),与预后不良相关。
与未破裂的病变相比,既往破裂的动脉瘤似乎更容易发生与血管内治疗相关的穿孔。与前循环病变相比,后循环病变在栓塞过程中发生医源性破裂的预后更差。当识别出穿孔时,明确的治疗方法似乎是逆转抗凝治疗并完成 Guglielmi 可脱性弹簧圈栓塞。在这些病例中,立即进行神经外科干预有限,重点是通过急诊脑室造瘘术降低 ICP。然而,这些措施可能挽救生命,在治疗这些病例时必须随时有神经外科协助。