Suppr超能文献

评估直肠癌新辅助治疗临床完全缓解的预测价值:488例患者分析

Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients.

作者信息

Hiotis Spiros P, Weber Sharon M, Cohen Alfred M, Minsky Bruce D, Paty Phillip B, Guillem Jose G, Wagman Raquel, Saltz Leonard B, Wong W Douglas

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Feb;194(2):131-5; discussion 135-6. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01159-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with transmural or node-positive rectal cancer benefit from the addition of chemoradiation to surgical resection. Administration of the chemoradiation (combined modality therapy) preoperatively has gained popularity in recent years. Some patients undergo apparent complete tumor regression after preoperative combined modality therapy, and controversy exists about the proper management of these patients. Some investigators have proposed that such patients should simply be observed and not undergo resection.

STUDY DESIGN

The purpose of this study was to determine the significance of clinical complete response to preoperative combined modality therapy. Specifically, we have attempted to determine the frequency with which a clinical complete response (based on the absence of detectable tumor on preoperative digital rectal examination and proctoscopy) correlates with a pathologic complete response (based on the absence of cancer cells in the resected specimen). A retrospective review of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 488 patients from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prospective colorectal database who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by resection for primary rectal cancer was performed. The indications for preoperative therapy included clinical or ultrasound T3 or T4 tumors or node-positive disease.

RESULTS

The clinical complete response rate to preoperative therapy was 19%. All patients underwent resection subsequent to preoperative therapy regardless of response. The pathologic complete response rate among all patients was 10%. The pathologic complete response rate among clinical complete responders was 25%. Clinical complete response was a significant predictive factor for pathologic complete response, but the majority (75%) of clinical complete responders had persistent foci of tumor that were not detectable on preoperative examination or proctoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical complete response to preoperative therapy as determined by preoperative digital rectal examination and proctoscopy or EUA is not an accurate predictor of pathologic complete response. A significant percentage of clinical complete responders have persistent deep tumors or nodal involvement. We do not recommend making treatment decisions based solely on the absence of clinically palpable or visible tumor after chemoradiation. Our data suggest that all acceptable-risk patients with a diagnosis of primary rectal cancer should undergo resection, regardless of their response to preoperative therapy.

摘要

背景

透壁性或淋巴结阳性直肠癌患者可从手术切除联合放化疗中获益。近年来,术前给予放化疗(综合治疗模式)越来越普遍。一些患者在术前综合治疗后出现明显的肿瘤完全消退,对于这些患者的恰当处理存在争议。一些研究者提出,此类患者应仅进行观察而不接受手术切除。

研究设计

本研究的目的是确定术前综合治疗临床完全缓解的意义。具体而言,我们试图确定临床完全缓解(基于术前直肠指检和直肠镜检查未发现可检测到的肿瘤)与病理完全缓解(基于切除标本中无癌细胞)的相关频率。对纪念斯隆凯特琳前瞻性结直肠癌数据库中488例接受术前放化疗后行原发性直肠癌切除术患者的临床和病理特征进行了回顾性分析。术前治疗的指征包括临床或超声检查提示T3或T4期肿瘤或淋巴结阳性疾病。

结果

术前治疗的临床完全缓解率为19%。所有患者在术前治疗后均接受了手术切除,无论治疗反应如何。所有患者的病理完全缓解率为10%。临床完全缓解者的病理完全缓解率为25%。临床完全缓解是病理完全缓解的重要预测因素,但大多数(75%)临床完全缓解者存在术前检查或直肠镜检查未发现的持续性肿瘤病灶。

结论

术前直肠指检、直肠镜检查或术中评估确定的术前治疗临床完全缓解并非病理完全缓解的准确预测指标。相当一部分临床完全缓解者存在持续性深部肿瘤或淋巴结受累。我们不建议仅根据放化疗后临床上未触及或可见肿瘤来做出治疗决策。我们的数据表明,所有诊断为原发性直肠癌且可接受手术的患者均应接受手术切除,无论其对术前治疗的反应如何。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验