Spalding Elaine M, Chamney Paul W, Farrington Ken
Department of Nephrology, Lister Hospital, Herts, England, United Kingdom.
Kidney Int. 2002 Feb;61(2):655-67. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00146.x.
Hyperphosphatemia in the hemodialysis population is ubiquitous, but phosphate kinetics during hemodialysis is poorly understood.
Twenty-nine hemodialysis patients each received one long and one short dialysis, equivalent in terms of urea clearance. Phosphate concentrations were measured during each treatment and for one hour thereafter. A new model of phosphate kinetics was developed and implemented in VisSim. This model characterized additional processes involved in phosphate kinetics explaining the departure of the measured data from a standard two-pool model.
Pre-dialysis phosphate concentrations were similar in long and short dialysis groups. Post-dialysis phosphate concentrations in long dialysis were higher than in short dialysis (P < 0.02) despite removal of a greater mass of phosphate (P < 0.001). In both long and short dialysis serum phosphate concentrations initially fell in accordance with two-pool kinetics, but thereafter plateaued or increased despite continuing phosphate removal. Implementation of an additional regulatory mechanism such that a third pool liberates phosphate to maintain an intrinsic target concentration (1.18 +/- 0.06 mmol/L; 95% confidence intervals, CI) explained the data in 24% of treatments. The further addition of a fourth pool hysteresis element triggered by critically low phosphate levels (0.80 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, CI) yielded an excellent correlation with the observed data in the remaining 76% of treatments (cumulative standard deviation 0.027 +/- 0.004 mmol/L, CI). The critically low concentration correlated with pre-dialysis phosphate levels (r=0.67, P < 0.0001).
Modeling of phosphate kinetics during hemodialysis implies regulation involving up to four phosphate pools. The accuracy of this model suggests that the proposed mechanisms have physiological validity.
血液透析人群中高磷血症很普遍,但血液透析过程中的磷动力学却鲜为人知。
29名血液透析患者每人接受一次长时间透析和一次短时间透析,两次透析的尿素清除率相当。在每次治疗期间及之后一小时测量磷浓度。开发了一种新的磷动力学模型并在VisSim中实现。该模型描述了磷动力学中涉及的其他过程,解释了测量数据与标准双池模型的偏差。
长时间透析组和短时间透析组的透析前磷浓度相似。尽管长时间透析清除的磷质量更多(P < 0.001),但其透析后磷浓度高于短时间透析(P < 0.02)。在长时间和短时间透析中,血清磷浓度最初均按照双池动力学下降,但此后尽管持续清除磷,浓度却趋于平稳或上升。实施一种额外的调节机制,即第三个池释放磷以维持固有目标浓度(1.18±0.06 mmol/L;95%置信区间,CI),在24%的治疗中解释了数据。由极低磷水平(0.80±0.07 mmol/L,CI)触发的第四个池滞后元素的进一步添加,在其余76%的治疗中与观察数据具有极好的相关性(累积标准差0.027±0.004 mmol/L,CI)。极低浓度与透析前磷水平相关(r = 0.67,P < 0.0001)。
血液透析期间磷动力学建模意味着涉及多达四个磷池的调节。该模型的准确性表明所提出的机制具有生理有效性。