Petersen Timothy, Dording Christina, Neault Nicole B, Kornbluh Rebecca, Alpert Jonathan E, Nierenberg Andrew A, Rosenbaum Jerrold F, Fava Maurizio
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;26(1):177-87. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00250-0.
With the increasing number and type of antidepressants available to clinicians, there is a need to better understand current prescribing practices and to what degree these practices reflect research findings. The purpose of this study was to examine prescribing practices in a sample of psychiatrists attending a psychopharmacology review course and compare these results with empirical evidence.
439 of 800 clinicians asked (55%) responded to a 10-item questionnaire that was given prior to beginning the review course. Items covered three major content areas: first-line preferences in the treatment of depression, antidepressant agents most associated with certain side effects, and first-line preferences in the treatment of certain depressive subtypes.
214 (49%) clinicians indicated a belief that one antidepressant type is more efficacious than others. Of these 214 clinicians, 103 (48%) indicated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as being most efficacious, while 53 (25%) indicated venlafaxine as being most efficacious; 378 (93%) clinicians indicated SSRIs as their first-line treatment preference. Mirtazapine (56%) was endorsed as most likely to be associated with weight gain, fluoxetine (57%) with sexual dysfunction, paroxetine (48%) with a discontinuation syndrome, and fluoxetine (52%) with agitation. For the treatment of anxious, atypical, and melancholic depression, SSRIs were the first choice of treatment (58%, 57%, and 57%), and for depression with prominent insomnia, mirtazapine and nefazadone (31% and 27%) were the first choices of treatment.
Despite the lack of evidence of a significant difference in efficacy between older and newer agents, clinicians perceive the newer agents to be more efficacious than the older drugs [tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)] even in the melancholic and anxious depressive subtypes. Similarly, although sexual dysfunction and agitation appear to occur at similar rates with all the SSRIs, fluoxetine was perceived to be most likely to cause these side effects. These findings are significant as they highlight the discrepancy between empirical evidence and clinical practices and suggest that other factors influence clinicians' medication choices in the treatment of depression.
随着临床医生可选用的抗抑郁药数量和种类不断增加,有必要更好地了解当前的处方习惯以及这些习惯在多大程度上反映了研究结果。本研究的目的是调查参加精神药理学复习课程的一组精神科医生的处方习惯,并将这些结果与实证证据进行比较。
在800名被邀请的临床医生中,有439名(55%)回复了在复习课程开始前发放的一份包含10个条目的问卷。条目涵盖三个主要内容领域:抑郁症治疗的一线首选药物、与某些副作用关联最大的抗抑郁药以及某些抑郁亚型治疗的一线首选药物。
214名(49%)临床医生表示认为某一种抗抑郁药比其他药物更有效。在这214名临床医生中,103名(48%)指出选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)最为有效,而53名(25%)指出文拉法辛最为有效;378名(93%)临床医生表示将SSRI作为他们的一线治疗首选。米氮平(56%)被认为最有可能与体重增加相关,氟西汀(57%)与性功能障碍相关,帕罗西汀(48%)与撤药综合征相关,氟西汀(52%)与激越相关。对于伴有焦虑、非典型和抑郁性抑郁的治疗,SSRI是首选治疗药物(分别为58%、57%和57%),对于伴有明显失眠的抑郁症,米氮平和奈法唑酮(分别为31%和27%)是首选治疗药物。
尽管缺乏证据表明新旧药物在疗效上存在显著差异,但临床医生认为即使在抑郁性和伴有焦虑的抑郁亚型中,新药也比旧药[三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)和单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOI)]更有效。同样,尽管性功能障碍和激越在所有SSRI中出现的几率似乎相似,但氟西汀被认为最有可能导致这些副作用。这些发现意义重大,因为它们突出了实证证据与临床实践之间的差异,并表明其他因素会影响临床医生在抑郁症治疗中的用药选择。