Lai Z, Lao Y, Ai F
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2000 Mar;36(2):129-30.
To evaluate the sensitivity of poly-static quantitative perimetry for the detection of visual field defect in open angle glaucoma.
48 patients (95 eyes) of open angle glaucoma were examined with poly-static quantitative perimetry [Friedmann visual field analyzer (FVFA)] and dynamic perimetry (tangent screen) respectively.
26 eyes showed small defect of visual field on tangent screen with 2/1,000 visual size, and 23 eyes (88%) showed the same defects checked with FVFA; visual field defects of early stage glaucoma were found in 26 eyes checked with FVFA, but only 16 eyes showed the same defects on tangent screen with 1/1,000 visual size; the visual field defects of glaucoma on tangent screen in 43 eyes were found larger when they were checked with FVFA.
Comparing with dynamic perimetry, poly-static quantitative perimetry is more sensitive to detect visual field defect of early stage glaucoma.
评估多静态定量视野检查法检测开角型青光眼视野缺损的敏感性。
分别采用多静态定量视野检查法[弗里德曼视野分析仪（FVFA）]和动态视野检查法（正切屏）对48例（95只眼）开角型青光眼患者进行检查。
正切屏检查显示26只眼有1/1000视标大小的小视野缺损，用FVFA检查时23只眼（88%）显示相同缺损；用FVFA检查发现26只眼有早期青光眼视野缺损，但正切屏检查时仅16只眼有1/1000视标大小的相同缺损；43只眼正切屏上青光眼视野缺损用FVFA检查时发现更大。
与动态视野检查法相比，多静态定量视野检查法检测早期青光眼视野缺损更敏感。
Zotero 插件