Maher Brion S, Marazita Mary L, Zubenko Wendy N, Spiker Duane G, Giles Donna E, Kaplan Barry B, Zubenko George S
Division of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Mar 8;114(2):214-21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10158.
Coordinated efforts are now underway to identify susceptibility genes for unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) and related disorders. These studies have focused on recurrent, early-onset MDD (RE-MDD), thought to be the most familial form of this disorder. The goal of this study was to conduct a complex segregation analysis of recurrent MDD and other major mood disorders aggregating in families identified by probands with RE-MDD. Eighty-one families were identified through probands over the age of 18 who met criteria for recurrent (> or =2 episodes), early-onset (< or =25 years), nonpsychotic, unipolar MDD (RE-MDD) and included 407 first-degree relatives and 835 extended relatives. Psychiatric diagnoses for probands and their family members who provided blood samples were formulated from structured personal interviews, structured family history assessments, and available medical records. The remaining family members who participated and those who were deceased were evaluated through the family history method augmented by available medical records. Best-estimate diagnoses were made during a consensus conference according to established diagnostic criteria. Segregation analyses were performed using the REGD routine in S.A.G.E. release 4.0. The segregation analysis of recurrent MDD supported a sex-independent Mendelian codominant model. Analysis of major mood disorders supported a sex-independent Mendelian dominant model. Interestingly, inclusion of spousal residual correlations provided better fitting models for recurrent MDD but not the broader phenotype of major mood disorders. Unlike unipolar MDD, the lifetime prevalence of bipolar I disorder in this sample of families did not exceed the reported population prevalence [Zubenko et al., 2001]. Our results suggest that a major locus contributes to the expression of recurrent MDD and possibly other major mood disorders within families identified by probands with RE-MDD. Due to the limitations of the segregation analysis model, our results cannot address whether the same major locus is segregating across families in our sample or whether multiple major loci are involved (genetic heterogeneity). The absence of aggregation of bipolar I disorder in these families strongly suggests that while the genetic determinants of unipolar and bipolar disorders may overlap, they are not identical. Our findings illustrate the advantage of employing families identified by probands with RE-MDD in studies designed to detect susceptibility loci for unipolar MDD and related disorders.
目前正在开展协同努力,以确定单相重度抑郁症(MDD)及相关疾病的易感基因。这些研究聚焦于复发性早发性MDD(RE-MDD),它被认为是该疾病最具家族性的形式。本研究的目的是对复发性MDD和其他主要心境障碍进行复杂分离分析,这些障碍在由患有RE-MDD的先证者所确定的家族中聚集出现。通过18岁以上符合复发性(≥2次发作)、早发性(≤25岁)、非精神病性、单相MDD(RE-MDD)标准的先证者确定了81个家族,其中包括407名一级亲属和835名扩展亲属。先证者及其提供血样的家庭成员的精神病学诊断是根据结构化个人访谈、结构化家族史评估以及现有医疗记录做出的。其余参与的家庭成员以及已故成员则通过家族史方法并结合现有医疗记录进行评估。在共识会议期间根据既定诊断标准做出最佳估计诊断。使用S.A.G.E. 4.0版中的REGD程序进行分离分析。复发性MDD的分离分析支持性别独立的孟德尔共显性模型。主要心境障碍的分析支持性别独立的孟德尔显性模型。有趣的是,纳入配偶残余相关性为复发性MDD提供了拟合更好的模型,但对更广泛的主要心境障碍表型则不然。与单相MDD不同,在这个家族样本中双相I型障碍的终生患病率并未超过所报道的人群患病率[祖本科等人,2001年]。我们的结果表明,一个主要基因座促成了复发性MDD以及可能在由患有RE-MDD的先证者所确定的家族中的其他主要心境障碍的表达。由于分离分析模型的局限性,我们的结果无法解决在我们的样本中同一个主要基因座是否在家族间分离,或者是否涉及多个主要基因座(遗传异质性)。这些家族中双相I型障碍未出现聚集现象,这强烈表明虽然单相和双相障碍的遗传决定因素可能重叠,但并不相同。我们的研究结果说明了在旨在检测单相MDD及相关疾病易感基因座的研究中,采用由患有RE-MDD的先证者所确定的家族的优势。