Benazzi Franco, Akiskal Hagop S
Hecker Psychiatry Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, National Health Service, Forli, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 2008 Apr;107(1-3):77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.032. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
History of high depressive recurrence (without history of mania/hypomania) has been proposed as a mood subtype close to bipolar disorders. Herein we test whether this is the best approach to this question.
We systematically evaluated consecutive 224 Major Depressive (MDD) and 336 Bipolar II Disorders (BP-II) outpatients in a private practice, by the SCID for DSM-IV (modified for better probing hypomania by Akiskal and Benazzi [Akiskal, H.S., Benazzi, F., 2005. Optimizing the detection of bipolar II disorder in outpatient private practice: toward a systematization of clinical diagnostic wisdom. J. Clin. Psychiatry 66, 914-921]). We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses on such putative bipolar validators as early age at onset of first major depressive episode (before 21 years), high recurrence, family history for bipolar disorders, and depressive mixed states (mixed depression, i.e. depression plus concurrent hypomanic symptoms), in order to identify an MDD subgroup close to BP-II.
All bipolar validators were independent predictors of BP-II. Early onset was the only variable which identified an MDD subgroup significantly associated with all bipolar validators. This MDD subgroup was similar to BP-II on age at onset and bipolar family history, and had a high frequency of mixed depression. A dose-response relationship was found between number of bipolar validators present in MDD, and bipolar family history loading among MDD relatives.
Study limited to outpatients.
From among the bipolar validators, early age at onset of first major depression (<21 years) was superior to high recurrence (>4 depressive episodes) in identifying an MDD subgroup close to BP-II, which might be subsumed under the broad bipolar spectrum. Implications of unipolar-bipolar boundaries and genetic investigations are discussed.
高抑郁复发史(无躁狂/轻躁狂史)被认为是一种接近双相情感障碍的情绪亚型。在此,我们检验这是否是解决该问题的最佳方法。
我们在一家私人诊所中,通过DSM-IV的SCID(由Akiskal和Benazzi进行了修改以更好地探查轻躁狂 [Akiskal, H.S., Benazzi, F., 2005. 优化门诊私人诊所中双相II型障碍的检测:迈向临床诊断智慧的系统化。《临床精神病学杂志》66, 914 - 921]),对224例连续性重度抑郁(MDD)门诊患者和336例双相II型障碍(BP-II)门诊患者进行了系统评估。我们对诸如首次重度抑郁发作的早发年龄(21岁之前)、高复发率、双相情感障碍家族史以及抑郁混合状态(混合性抑郁,即抑郁加并发的轻躁狂症状)等假定的双相情感障碍验证指标进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定一个接近BP-II的MDD亚组。
所有双相情感障碍验证指标都是BP-II的独立预测因素。早发是唯一能识别出与所有双相情感障碍验证指标显著相关的MDD亚组的变量。该MDD亚组在发病年龄和双相情感障碍家族史上与BP-II相似,且混合性抑郁的发生率较高。在MDD中存在的双相情感障碍验证指标数量与MDD亲属中的双相情感障碍家族史负荷之间发现了剂量反应关系。
研究仅限于门诊患者。
在双相情感障碍验证指标中,首次重度抑郁发作的早发年龄(<21岁)在识别接近BP-II的MDD亚组方面优于高复发率(>4次抑郁发作),该亚组可能包含在广义的双相情感障碍谱系中。讨论了单相-双相界限及基因研究的意义。