• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳房X光检查和触诊足以用于乳腺癌筛查吗?一种反对观点。

Are mammography and palpation sufficient for breast cancer screening? A dissenting opinion.

作者信息

Keith Louis G, Oleszczuk Jaroslaw J, Laguens Martin

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1089/152460902753473417.

DOI:10.1089/152460902753473417
PMID:11860720
Abstract

Breast cancer is an equal opportunity killer in that as many as 60%-70% of breast cancer patients have no obvious risk factor(s). Thus, the continued reliance on the importance of risk factors to initiate screening programs may inhibit further inquiry into better diagnostic and prognostic indicators. An extensive review of past and recent literature reveals that mammography is not an objective examination. Its use as a screening tool is facilitated among women 40 years old and older whose breast tissue is primarily fatty and provides better visualization. Younger women are not generally advised to use mammography because of its potentially hazardous effects associated with repeated use of radiation. More importantly, regardless of patient age, radiologists interpret mammograms, and different degrees of interpretation error exist for different radiologists as well as for the same radiologist performing the analysis after a period of time. Thus, the use of mammography as the sole screening tool does not provide patients or physicians with a sense of confidence about sensitivity and specificity. Further, recent enthusiasm to promote mammography screening may give women unrealistic expectations, leading them to falsely believe that a negative examination is assurance that cancer is not present in its earliest detectable stage. We propose to supplement the physical examination and mammography with a third screening modality based on thermal detection monitors. This is a noninvasive and nonradiogenic tool and might enable clinicians to provide patients with every opportunity for early diagnosis.

摘要

乳腺癌是一种机会均等的杀手,因为多达60%-70%的乳腺癌患者没有明显的风险因素。因此,持续依赖风险因素对于启动筛查项目的重要性,可能会抑制对更好的诊断和预后指标的进一步探究。对过去和近期文献的广泛回顾显示,乳房X光检查并非客观的检查。对于40岁及以上的女性,乳房X光检查作为一种筛查工具更易实施,这些女性的乳房组织主要为脂肪组织,能提供更好的图像。由于反复使用辐射存在潜在危害,一般不建议年轻女性使用乳房X光检查。更重要的是,无论患者年龄如何,乳房X光片由放射科医生解读,不同的放射科医生以及同一放射科医生在一段时间后进行分析时,都存在不同程度的解读误差。因此,将乳房X光检查作为唯一的筛查工具,并不能让患者或医生对其敏感性和特异性有信心。此外,近期对推广乳房X光检查筛查的热情可能会让女性产生不切实际的期望,导致她们错误地认为阴性检查就能确保在最早可检测阶段不存在癌症。我们建议用基于热检测监测仪的第三种筛查方式来补充体格检查和乳房X光检查。这是一种非侵入性且无辐射的工具,可能使临床医生为患者提供一切早期诊断的机会。

相似文献

1
Are mammography and palpation sufficient for breast cancer screening? A dissenting opinion.乳房X光检查和触诊足以用于乳腺癌筛查吗?一种反对观点。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1089/152460902753473417.
2
Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?近期乳腺钼靶筛查结果为阴性的女性中的晚期乳腺癌:临床诊疗是否提供了早期检测的机会?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):39-46. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi036.
3
United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.美国预防服务工作组的乳房 X 光筛查建议:被忽视的科学。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W112-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5609.
4
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):716-26, W-236. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008.
5
The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.临床乳腺检查对乳腺筛查准确性的贡献。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Sep 16;101(18):1236-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp241. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
6
Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.USPSTF 建议对乳腺癌早期诊断的潜在影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3137-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1915-9. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
Breast cancer screening methods: a review of the evidence.乳腺癌筛查方法:证据综述
Health Care Women Int. 2003 Nov;24(9):773-93. doi: 10.1080/07399330390229957.
8
Screening clinical breast examination.临床乳腺检查筛查
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;83(4):789-801. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00028-8.
9
Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 4;105(17):1314-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt203. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.乳腺钼靶筛查、体格检查和乳腺超声检查的性能比较及影响因素评估:对27825例患者评估的分析
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Tumour Classification Using Ultrasound Elastography with Machine Learning: A Systematic Scoping Review.使用机器学习的超声弹性成像技术进行乳腺肿瘤分类:一项系统的范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 12;14(2):367. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020367.
2
The performance of steady-state harmonic magnetic resonance elastography when applied to viscoelastic materials.稳态谐波磁共振弹性成像在黏弹性材料中的应用性能。
Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):3970-9. doi: 10.1118/1.3454738.