Aapro Matti S
1 route du Muids, Clinique de Genolier, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland.
Support Care Cancer. 2002 Mar;10(2):106-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200100288. Epub 2001 Aug 23.
There is evidence that, in spite of the Perugia consensus, acute and delayed emesis are treated in a suboptimal way. Thus breakthrough and refractory emesis as defined in this paper may be related to inadequate therapy. Several interventions have been used in attempts to stop breakthrough emesis, including use or repeat use of setrons, corticosteroids, D2-receptor antagonists including neuroleptics, or sedatives. It has been documented that refractory emesis responds to various modifications of the original antiemetic regimen, including the addition of a D2-receptor antagonist or a switch to another setron. In conclusion, no level I or II evidence-based guidelines can be given, as few adequate studies have been performed in this area, which therefore remains poorly documented.
有证据表明,尽管有佩鲁贾共识,但急性和延迟性呕吐的治疗方式仍不尽人意。因此,本文所定义的突破性呕吐和难治性呕吐可能与治疗不足有关。为了试图阻止突破性呕吐,人们使用了多种干预措施,包括使用或重复使用5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂、皮质类固醇、包括抗精神病药在内的D2受体拮抗剂或镇静剂。有文献记载,难治性呕吐对原有的止吐方案进行各种调整有效,包括添加D2受体拮抗剂或换用另一种5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂。总之,由于该领域进行的充分研究较少,文献记载也很匮乏,因此无法给出一级或二级循证指南。