Suppr超能文献

电击极性对经胸心房除颤疗效的影响。

Effect of shock polarity on the efficacy of transthoracic atrial defibrillation.

作者信息

Rashba Eric J, Bouhouch Rachida, MacMurdy Karen A, Shorofsky Stephen R, Peters Robert W, Gold Michael R

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 21201-1595, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2002 Mar;143(3):541-5. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.120155.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The energy requirement for internal ventricular defibrillation is reduced by reversal of shock polarity. The influence of shock polarity on the efficacy of transthoracic atrial defibrillation is unknown.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 consecutive patients who were referred for elective cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The electrodes were placed in the anteroposterior position. The patients were randomized to receive either standard (anterior pad = cathode) or reversed polarity (anterior pad = anode) shocks with a damped sinusoidal monophasic waveform. A step-up protocol was used to estimate the cardioversion threshold. The initial shock energy was 50 J, with subsequent increments to 100, 200, 300, and 360 J in the event of cardioversion failure.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of the patient population were men, with a mean age of 66 +/- 13 years and a mean duration of AF of 242 +/- 556 days. The overall success rates of cardioversion were 84% for standard polarity and 78% for reversed polarity (P not significant). Among the patients who were successfully cardioverted, the mean atrial defibrillation threshold was 198 +/- 103 J for standard polarity and 212 +/- 107 J for reversed polarity (P not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Reversal of shock polarity does not improve transthoracic cardioversion efficacy with a standard damped sinusoidal monophasic waveform. Alternate strategies should be considered for patients who fail external cardioversion, such as adjunctive pharmacologic treatment, use of a biphasic shock waveform, or internal cardioversion.

摘要

背景

通过逆转电击极性可降低心室内除颤所需能量。电击极性对经胸心房除颤疗效的影响尚不清楚。

方法

这项前瞻性、随机研究纳入了110例连续因持续性心房颤动(AF)择期进行心脏复律的患者。电极置于前后位。患者被随机分为接受标准(前极板 = 阴极)或极性反转(前极板 = 阳极)的电击,采用衰减正弦单相波形。采用逐步递增方案估计心脏复律阈值。初始电击能量为50 J,若心脏复律失败,随后递增至100、200、300和360 J。

结果

患者群体中64%为男性,平均年龄66 ± 13岁,AF平均持续时间242 ± 556天。标准极性心脏复律的总体成功率为84%,极性反转的为78%(P无统计学意义)。在成功进行心脏复律的患者中,标准极性下心房除颤阈值平均为198 ± 103 J,极性反转时为212 ± 107 J(P无统计学意义)。

结论

对于标准衰减正弦单相波形,逆转电击极性并不能提高经胸心脏复律疗效。对于体外心脏复律失败的患者,应考虑其他策略,如辅助药物治疗、使用双相电击波形或体内心脏复律。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验