Rashba Eric J, Gold Michael R, Crawford Fred A, Leman Robert B, Peters Robert W, Shorofsky Stephen R
Division of Cardiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Dec 15;94(12):1572-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.044.
Biphasic shocks are more effective than damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the optimal protocol for CV with biphasic shocks has not been defined. We conducted a prospective, randomized study of 120 consecutive patients with persistent AF to delineate the dose-response curve for CV of AF with a biphasic truncated exponential shock waveform and to identify clinical predictors of shock efficacy. Our data suggest that the initial shock energy for CV with this waveform should be 200 J if the patient weighs <90 kg and 360 J if the patient weighs >/=90 kg.
对于心房颤动(AF)的经胸心脏复律(CV),双相电击比阻尼正弦波单相电击更有效,但双相电击进行心脏复律的最佳方案尚未确定。我们对120例持续性AF连续患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以描绘使用双相截断指数电击波形进行AF心脏复律的剂量反应曲线,并确定电击疗效的临床预测因素。我们的数据表明,如果患者体重<90kg,使用此波形进行心脏复律的初始电击能量应为200J;如果患者体重≥90kg,则为360J。