LaMontagne M G, Michel F C, Holden P A, Reddy C A
Department of Microbiology and Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA.
J Microbiol Methods. 2002 May;49(3):255-64. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00377-3.
Analysis of microbial community structure in complex environmental samples using nucleic acid techniques requires efficient unbiased DNA extraction procedures; however, humic acids and other contaminants complicate the isolation of PCR-amplifiable DNA from compost and other organic-rich samples. In this study, combinations of DNA extraction and purification methods were compared based on DNA yield, humic acid contamination, PCR amplifiability, and microbial community structure assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (TRFLP) of amplified 16S rRNA genes. DNA yield and humic acid contamination, determined by A230, varied significantly between extraction methods. Humic acid contamination of DNA obtained from compost decreased with increasing salt concentration in the lysis buffer. DNA purified by gel permeation chromatography (Sepharose 4B columns) gave satisfactory PCR amplification with universal eubacterial 16S rRNA gene primers only when A260/A280 ratios exceeded 1.5. DNA purified with affinity chromatography (hydroxyapatite columns), and showing A260/A280 ratios as high as 1.8, did not show consistently satisfactory PCR amplification using the same 16S rRNA primers. Almost all DNA samples purified by agarose gel electrophoresis showed satisfactory PCR amplification. Principal components analysis (PCA) of TRFLP patterns differentiated compost types based on the presence/absence of peaks and on the height of the peaks, but differences in TRFLP patterns were not appreciable between extraction methods that yielded relatively pure DNA. High levels of humic acid contamination in extracted DNA resulted in TRFLP patterns that were not consistent and introduced a bias towards lower estimates of diversity.
利用核酸技术分析复杂环境样品中的微生物群落结构需要高效且无偏差的DNA提取程序;然而,腐殖酸和其他污染物使从堆肥及其他富含有机物的样品中分离可用于PCR扩增的DNA变得复杂。在本研究中,基于DNA产量、腐殖酸污染情况、PCR扩增能力以及通过扩增的16S rRNA基因的末端限制性片段长度多态性(TRFLP)评估的微生物群落结构,对DNA提取和纯化方法的组合进行了比较。通过A230测定的DNA产量和腐殖酸污染情况在不同提取方法之间存在显著差异。从堆肥中获得的DNA的腐殖酸污染随着裂解缓冲液中盐浓度的增加而降低。只有当A260/A280比值超过1.5时,通过凝胶渗透色谱法(琼脂糖4B柱)纯化的DNA才能用通用的真细菌16S rRNA基因引物进行令人满意的PCR扩增。用亲和色谱法(羟基磷灰石柱)纯化且A260/A280比值高达1.8的DNA,使用相同的16S rRNA引物时并未始终显示出令人满意的PCR扩增效果。几乎所有通过琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化的DNA样品都显示出令人满意的PCR扩增效果。基于TRFLP图谱的主成分分析(PCA)根据峰的有无和峰高区分了堆肥类型,但在产生相对纯净DNA的提取方法之间,TRFLP图谱的差异并不明显。提取的DNA中高水平的腐殖酸污染导致TRFLP图谱不一致,并导致对多样性的估计偏低。