Seunath O M
Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Oct;41(2):459-63. doi: 10.2466/pms.1975.41.2.459.
Conflict in predictions resulting from Eysenck's (1957) and Gray's (1970) theoretical formulations on personality and conditioning were tested at the behavioral level. Given conditions which do not produce over-arousal, it would be predicted from Eysenck's position that Introverts would condition better than Extraverts. From Gray's formulation it would follow that Introverts condition better if negative reinforcement is used and Extraverts condition better if positive reinforcement is used. The two opposing predictions were tested in pursuit rotor learning by either positively or negatively reinforcing the hit/miss dimension of performance by 166 males aged 14 to 15 yr. The results gave support to Gray's position but if over-arousal is assumed Eysenck's position is tenable.
艾森克(1957年)和格雷(1970年)关于人格与条件作用的理论阐述所产生的预测冲突在行为层面进行了检验。在不会导致过度唤醒的给定条件下,从艾森克的观点可以预测,内向者比外向者的条件作用效果更好。根据格雷的阐述,如果使用负强化,内向者的条件作用效果更好;如果使用正强化,外向者的条件作用效果更好。通过对166名14至15岁男性在追踪转子学习中通过对击中/未击中表现维度进行正强化或负强化,对这两种相反的预测进行了检验。结果支持了格雷的观点,但如果假设存在过度唤醒,艾森克的观点也是成立的。