Broers S, le Cessie S, van Vliet K P, Spinhoven Ph, van der Ven N C W, Radder J K
Section of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Diabet Med. 2002 Feb;19(2):157-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00682.x.
The aims of the present study were: (i) to evaluate the effects of a Dutch translation and adaptation of Blood Glucose Awareness Training (BGAT-III) on blood glucose (bg) perception, glycaemic control, and decisions not to drive or to raise the bg during hypoglycaemia; (ii) to compare the effects of individual and group BGAT.
Fifty-nine patients with Type 1 diabetes participated in BGAT in either a group or an individual setting. Before and after BGAT, 39 (66%) of them completed 30-70 measurements on a hand-held computer (hhc). During every measurement, they estimated their bg, indicated whether they would drive or raise their bg on the basis of their estimation, and then measured their bg.
Individual and group BGAT did not have significantly different effects (P = 0.35-0.98). Overall, BGAT did not significantly affect bg perception (P = 0.11-0.65). Before BGAT patients recognized a mean of 32% of their hypoglycaemic episodes, after BGAT a mean of 39% (P = 0.12). After BGAT, patients more often decided not to drive when their bg was low (P = 0.03). They tended to decide more often to raise their bg during hypoglycaemia (P = 0.09).
The effects of BGAT were smaller than expected. Possible reasons for this negative outcome may be the adapted version of BGAT (shorter in duration), a lack of statistical power, or a difference between American and European samples in their reaction to BGAT.
本研究的目的是:(i)评估荷兰语翻译和改编的血糖意识训练(BGAT-III)对血糖(bg)感知、血糖控制以及低血糖期间不驾驶或升高血糖的决策的影响;(ii)比较个体和团体BGAT的效果。
59名1型糖尿病患者在团体或个体环境中参加了BGAT。在BGAT前后,其中39名(66%)患者在手持电脑(hhc)上完成了30 - 70次测量。每次测量时,他们估计自己的血糖,根据估计表明是否会驾驶或升高血糖,然后测量血糖。
个体和团体BGAT的效果没有显著差异(P = 0.35 - 0.98)。总体而言,BGAT对血糖感知没有显著影响(P = 0.11 - 0.65)。在BGAT之前,患者平均能识别出32%的低血糖发作,BGAT之后平均为39%(P = 0.12)。BGAT之后,患者在血糖低时更常决定不驾驶(P = 0.03)。他们在低血糖期间倾向于更频繁地决定升高血糖(P = 0.09)。
BGAT的效果小于预期。这一负面结果的可能原因可能是BGAT的改编版本(持续时间较短)、统计效力不足,或者美国和欧洲样本对BGAT的反应存在差异。