Spinou Ekaterini, Kubba Haytham, Konstantinidis Iordannis, Johnston Andrew
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Monklands General Hospital, Airdrie, Scotland ML6 0RD, UK.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Mar 15;63(1):15-7. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(01)00633-4.
Unilateral tonsillar enlargement (UTE) may be a sign of underlying malignancy and tonsillectomy is often recommended for histology. The limited evidence available suggests that the incidence of malignancy in children with UTE is very low, and that in many cases, the apparent enlargement is due to asymmetry of the mucosa of the tonsillar pillars. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of tonsillectomy as a routine practice for every case of UTE.
We attempted to identify every child (age < 16 years) undergoing tonsillectomy in our unit from January 1991 to January 2000 where the indication for surgery was UTE. Patients were excluded if the primary indication for surgery was anything other than UTE. The case notes and pathology records were reviewed.
Exactly 47 children were identified, aged between 4 and 15 years of age (mean 9.5 years), of whom 29 (62%) were girls. In all cases, the tonsillar asymmetry was noted by the otolaryngologist, but had not been noted by the patient or parents, or commented on by the referring General Practitioner. Eighteen of the children (38%) had no history of sore throats. No malignancies were encountered. When the tonsils were measured by the pathologist after excision, the actual degree of asymmetry in size ranged from 0 to 25 mm. In seven cases (15%), the clinically larger tonsil was actually the smaller of the two when examined by the pathologist. In 17 cases (36%) there was no difference in size at all.
We conclude that apparent UTE is often spurious, and that many unnecessary tonsillectomies are performed when UTE is taken as an indication for surgery in the absence of any other suspicious features. Tonsillectomy carries risks and clinical observation may be prudent where clinical suspicion is low.
单侧扁桃体肿大(UTE)可能是潜在恶性肿瘤的迹象,通常建议进行扁桃体切除术以获取组织学诊断。现有有限的证据表明,UTE患儿的恶性肿瘤发生率非常低,而且在许多情况下,明显的肿大是由于扁桃体柱黏膜不对称所致。本研究的目的是评估将扁桃体切除术作为UTE每例常规治疗方法的必要性。
我们试图识别1991年1月至2000年1月在我们科室接受扁桃体切除术且手术指征为UTE的每一名儿童(年龄<16岁)。如果手术的主要指征不是UTE,则将患者排除。对病历和病理记录进行了回顾。
共确定了47名儿童,年龄在4至15岁之间(平均9.5岁),其中29名(62%)为女孩。在所有病例中,耳鼻喉科医生均注意到扁桃体不对称,但患者或家长未注意到,转诊的全科医生也未提及。18名儿童(38%)无咽痛病史。未发现恶性肿瘤。病理学家在切除扁桃体后进行测量时,实际大小不对称程度在0至25毫米之间。在7例(15%)病例中,病理学家检查时临床上较大的扁桃体实际上是较小的那个。在17例(36%)病例中,大小完全没有差异。
我们得出结论,明显的UTE往往是假的,在没有任何其他可疑特征的情况下,将UTE作为手术指征时会进行许多不必要的扁桃体切除术。扁桃体切除术有风险,在临床怀疑较低时,进行临床观察可能更为谨慎。