Dolev Yalon, Daniel Sam J
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal Children's Hospital, Quebec, Canada.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jan;72(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
There is a significant debate over the need for tonsillectomy to rule out lymphoma in cases of unilateral tonsillar enlargement. Several publications have suggested that the presence of unilateral tonsillar enlargement in children was an ominous sign of the possibility of underlying lymphoma. More recently, some authors have recommended that routine tonsillectomy in this context is not indicated given the low incidence of tonsillar lymphoma in the pediatric population and the high cost associated with this procedure. The aim of this study is to determine whether or not children diagnosed with tonsillar lymphoma originally presented with unilateral tonsillar enlargement.
We queried the tumour board registry records at a pediatric tertiary care institution from 1949 to January 2006 for all cases of tonsillar lymphoma. We examined the clinic, pre-operative and operative notes as well as the pathology results and noted the presenting signs and symptoms with a specific interest in the presence of unilateral tonsillar enlargement.
Our query returned six patients with a diagnosis of palatine tonsil lymphoma. All six identified patients presented at their first visit with clinically apparent asymmetry of the tonsils. In all six cases B symptoms were absent at the first visit.
We conclude that even though the majority of patients who have unilateral tonsillar enlargement will not have tonsillar lymphoma, most patients with tonsillar lymphoma will have unilateral tonsillar enlargement as one of their presenting signs. Therefore, despite the low incidence of this malignancy in children, careful close follow-up of these patients is warranted until the diagnosis has been ruled out given the potentially devastating consequences of missing this diagnosis or prolonging the time to treatment. Moreover, a low level of suspicion should warrant a tonsillectomy.
对于在单侧扁桃体肿大病例中是否需要进行扁桃体切除术以排除淋巴瘤,存在重大争议。一些出版物表明,儿童单侧扁桃体肿大是潜在淋巴瘤可能性的不祥征兆。最近,一些作者建议,鉴于儿科人群中扁桃体淋巴瘤的发病率较低以及该手术相关成本较高,在此情况下不建议进行常规扁桃体切除术。本研究的目的是确定最初被诊断为扁桃体淋巴瘤的儿童是否最初表现为单侧扁桃体肿大。
我们查询了一家儿科三级医疗机构1949年至2006年1月肿瘤委员会登记记录中的所有扁桃体淋巴瘤病例。我们检查了临床、术前和手术记录以及病理结果,并特别关注单侧扁桃体肿大的体征和症状。
我们的查询返回了6例诊断为腭扁桃体淋巴瘤的患者。所有6例确诊患者初诊时均表现为临床上明显的扁桃体不对称。所有6例患者初诊时均无B症状。
我们得出结论,尽管大多数单侧扁桃体肿大的患者不会患扁桃体淋巴瘤,但大多数扁桃体淋巴瘤患者会将单侧扁桃体肿大作为其首发体征之一。因此,尽管儿童中这种恶性肿瘤的发病率较低,但鉴于漏诊或延长治疗时间可能产生的毁灭性后果,在排除诊断之前,对这些患者进行仔细密切的随访是必要的。此外,低度怀疑也应进行扁桃体切除术。