Rosenbaum Julie Rothstein, Sepkowitz Kent A
Department of Internal Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Apr 1;34(7):963-71. doi: 10.1086/339328. Epub 2002 Mar 1.
The current care of patients with infectious diseases owes a tremendous debt to healthy volunteers who allowed investigators to induce disease in them for the study of transmission, natural history, and treatment. We reviewed the English-language medical literature about the rarely discussed subject of the use of healthy volunteers in human-subject research in infectious diseases to determine the contributions of these experiments to the current understanding of disease transmission. The literature review focused on hepatitis, upper respiratory infections, and malaria, which represent the array of issues involved in this type of research. Researchers successfully induced infection through injecting, nebulizing, and feeding specimens to thousands of volunteers, who included authentic volunteers as well as soldiers and imprisoned subjects. These volunteers often undertook unforeseen and unpredictable risks during these experiments for the benefit of others. Future research in these areas must strike an adequate balance between the risks to participants and the benefits to society.
当前传染病患者的治疗极大地得益于健康志愿者,他们允许研究人员在其身上诱发疾病,以研究疾病传播、自然史和治疗方法。我们查阅了英文医学文献中关于在传染病人体研究中使用健康志愿者这一鲜有讨论的主题,以确定这些实验对当前疾病传播理解的贡献。文献综述聚焦于肝炎、上呼吸道感染和疟疾,这些代表了这类研究中涉及的一系列问题。研究人员通过向数千名志愿者注射、雾化和喂食标本成功诱发感染,这些志愿者包括真正的志愿者以及士兵和被监禁者。在这些实验中,这些志愿者常常为了他人的利益承担了不可预见和不可预测的风险。未来在这些领域的研究必须在参与者的风险和对社会的益处之间达成适当平衡。