Weber Sharon M, DeMatteo Ronald P, Fong Yuman, Blumgart Leslie H, Jarnagin William R
Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):392-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00011.
To evaluate the benefit of staging laparoscopy in patients with gallbladder cancer and hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
In patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinoma, unresectable disease is often found at the time of exploration despite extensive preoperative evaluation, thus resulting in unnecessary laparotomy.
From October 1997 to May 2001, 100 patients with potentially resectable gallbladder cancer (n = 44) and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 56) were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent staging laparoscopy followed by laparotomy if the tumor appeared resectable. Surgical findings, resectability rate, length of stay, and operative time were analyzed.
Patients underwent multiple preoperative imaging tests, including computed tomography scan, ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and direct cholangiography. Laparoscopy identified unresectable disease in 35 of 100 patients. In the 65 patients undergoing open exploration, 34 were found to have unresectable disease. Therefore, the overall accuracy for detecting unresectable disease was 51%. There was no difference in the accuracy of laparoscopy between patients with gallbladder cancer and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Laparoscopy detected the majority of patients with peritoneal or liver metastases but failed to detect all locally advanced tumors. In patients undergoing biopsy only, laparoscopic identification of unresectable disease significantly reduced operative time and length of stay compared with patients undergoing laparotomy. The yield of laparoscopy was 48% in patients with gallbladder cancer (56% in those who did not undergo previous cholecystectomy), but only 25% in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, in patients with locally advanced but potentially resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the yield of laparoscopy was greater, 36% (12/33, T2/T3 tumors) versus 9% (2/23, T1 tumors).
Laparoscopy identifies the majority of patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder carcinoma, thereby reducing both the incidence of unnecessary laparotomy and the length of stay. The yield of laparoscopy is lower for hilar cholangiocarcinoma but can be improved by targeting patients at higher risk of occult unresectable disease. All patients with potentially resectable primary gallbladder cancer and patients with T2/T3 hilar cholangiocarcinoma should undergo staging laparoscopy before surgical exploration.
评估分期腹腔镜检查对胆囊癌和肝门部胆管癌患者的益处。
在肝外胆管癌患者中,尽管术前进行了广泛评估,但在探查时仍常发现无法切除的病变,从而导致不必要的剖腹手术。
1997年10月至2001年5月,对100例可能可切除的胆囊癌患者(n = 44)和肝门部胆管癌患者(n = 56)进行了前瞻性评估。所有患者均接受分期腹腔镜检查,若肿瘤看似可切除则随后进行剖腹手术。分析手术结果、可切除率、住院时间和手术时间。
患者接受了多项术前影像学检查,包括计算机断层扫描、超声、磁共振胆胰管造影和直接胆管造影。腹腔镜检查在100例患者中的35例发现了无法切除的病变。在65例行开放探查的患者中,34例被发现有无法切除的病变。因此,检测无法切除病变的总体准确率为51%。胆囊癌和肝门部胆管癌患者腹腔镜检查的准确率无差异。腹腔镜检查发现了大多数有腹膜或肝转移的患者,但未能检测出所有局部晚期肿瘤。仅接受活检的患者中,与接受剖腹手术的患者相比,腹腔镜检查发现无法切除的病变显著缩短了手术时间和住院时间。胆囊癌患者腹腔镜检查的阳性率为48%(未行胆囊切除术的患者中为56%),但肝门部胆管癌患者仅为25%。然而,在局部晚期但可能可切除的肝门部胆管癌患者中,腹腔镜检查的阳性率更高,为36%(T2/T3肿瘤患者中为12/33),而T1肿瘤患者中为9%(2/23)。
腹腔镜检查可识别大多数无法切除的肝门部胆管癌或胆囊癌患者,从而降低不必要剖腹手术的发生率和住院时间。肝门部胆管癌腹腔镜检查的阳性率较低,但通过针对隐匿性无法切除疾病风险较高的患者可提高阳性率。所有可能可切除的原发性胆囊癌患者和T2/T3肝门部胆管癌患者在手术探查前均应接受分期腹腔镜检查。