Erséus Christer, Källersjö Mari, Ekman Maria, Hovmöller Rasmus
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, SE-104 05, Sweden.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Mar;22(3):414-22. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1063.
The phylogeny of the Tubificidae, and of most of its subfamilies and some of its genera, is revisited, on the basis of sequences of 18S ribosomal DNA in a selection of species. Forty-six new 18S sequences of Naididae (6), Tubificidae (37), Phreodrilidae (1), Lumbriculidae (1), and Enchytraeidae (1) are reported and aligned together with corresponding sequences of 21 previously studied taxa. The 18S gene of Insulodrilus bifidus provides the first molecular evidence that phreodrilids are closely related to tubificids, corroborating previous conclusions based on morphology. The data further support the monophyletic status of Tubificidae, provided that the "Naididae" is regarded a part of this family; "naidids" may not even constitute a monophyletic group. It is thus suggested that the family name Naididae is formally suppressed as a junior synonym of the Tubificidae. The 18S gene also resolves a number of relationships within the tubificids. Among the subfamilies, Tubificinae is supported, Rhyacodrilinae and Phallodrilinae are revealed as nonmonophyletic, and Limnodriloidinae remains unresolved. Most tubificid genera tested for monophyly are corroborated by the data, only one (Tubifex) is refuted, and two (Tubificoides and Limnodriloides) are unresolved from other taxa. It is concluded that it will be valuable to expand the taxonomic sampling for 18S rDNA in clitellates, and in annelids in general, as this is likely to improve the resolution at many levels. However, it will be equally important to combine the annelid 18S data with other gene sequences and nonmolecular characters, to estimate the phylogeny of these common and diverse worms with greater precision.
基于部分物种的18S核糖体DNA序列,对颤蚓科及其多数亚科和部分属的系统发育进行了重新研究。报告了颤蚓科(37个)、仙女虫科(6个)、杆吻蚓科(1个)、线蚓科(1个)和线蚓科(1个)的46条新18S序列,并将其与21个先前研究的分类单元的相应序列进行比对。双叉岛蚓的18S基因提供了首个分子证据,表明杆吻蚓科与颤蚓科密切相关,证实了先前基于形态学得出的结论。这些数据进一步支持了颤蚓科的单系地位,前提是将“仙女虫科”视为该科的一部分;“仙女虫”甚至可能不构成一个单系类群。因此,建议正式将仙女虫科这一名称作为颤蚓科的次异名予以废止。18S基因还解决了颤蚓科内部的一些关系。在亚科中,颤蚓亚科得到支持,河蚓亚科和阴茎蚓亚科被发现不是单系的,而沼蚓亚科仍未解决。大多数测试单系性的颤蚓科属得到了数据的支持,只有一个属(颤蚓属)被否定,另外两个属(拟颤蚓属和沼蚓属)与其他分类单元的关系未得到解决。结论是,扩大对寡毛纲动物,特别是对环节动物18S rDNA的分类采样将是有价值的,因为这可能会在多个层面提高分辨率。然而,将环节动物的18S数据与其他基因序列和非分子特征相结合,以更精确地估计这些常见且多样的蠕虫的系统发育同样重要。