Peters M W, Smith M F, Smith G W
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1225, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2002 Mar;80(3):862-5. doi: 10.2527/2002.803862x.
In higher education, increasing emphasis is being placed on the use of new technologies in the classroom. However, the emphasis needs to be placed on methods that truly enhance understanding and knowledge retention. Class discussions help students understand and retain information previously presented in lecture format. Furthermore, if students are challenged to critically evaluate, communicate, and defend their ideas, knowledge retention and understanding will increase even more. Critical interactive thinking exercises (CITE) were employed at two different universities to enhance student knowledge retention and promote the development of critical thinking. Applicability of CITE to undergraduate learning was assessed over a 3-yr period in the undergraduate reproductive physiology courses at Michigan State University and the University of Missouri-Columbia. For each exercise, students were challenged to prepare a one-page, double-spaced composition addressing an incompletely understood phenomenon or problem-solving situation related to the reproductive system. In preparing their compositions, students were encouraged to use information previously presented in lecture plus outside information to develop their ideas. Students were required to formulate and defend a hypothesis or approach to the problem presented. At the subsequent class period, students were divided into groups of three to four, in which they interactively discussed their ideas. Each group member was challenged to defend his or her hypothesis and explanation and to persuade other group members to adopt their ideas. Each group then arrived at a consensual opinion that was presented during a discussion by the entire class. The class then debated the merits of each group's hypothesis or explanation and the supporting arguments presented. At first, the students were apprehensive about the CITE, particularly about communicating and defending ideas with their classmates. However, course evaluations showed that 131 out of 137 students considered the CITE a positive experience that enhanced learning. Additionally, 131 out of 137 students reported that the CITE enhanced their critical thinking skills. We feel that the use of CITE in teaching reproductive theory to undergraduate students fosters critical thinking skills, communication skills, and knowledge retention. The general concept can be readily applied to courses in other subject areas in the animal sciences.
在高等教育中,课堂上对新技术的使用越来越受到重视。然而,重点应放在真正能提高理解和知识保留率的方法上。课堂讨论有助于学生理解和记住之前以讲座形式呈现的信息。此外,如果要求学生批判性地评估、交流和捍卫自己的观点,知识保留率和理解能力将进一步提高。两所不同的大学采用了批判性互动思维练习(CITE)来提高学生的知识保留率,并促进批判性思维的发展。在密歇根州立大学和密苏里大学哥伦比亚分校的本科生殖生理学课程中,对CITE在本科学习中的适用性进行了为期三年的评估。对于每个练习,要求学生准备一篇单倍行距、一页纸的作文,讨论一个与生殖系统相关的理解不透彻的现象或解决问题的情境。在准备作文时,鼓励学生利用讲座中之前呈现的信息以及外部信息来拓展自己的观点。学生们需要针对所提出的问题形成并捍卫一个假设或方法。在随后的课堂上,学生们被分成三到四人一组,在小组中互动讨论他们的观点。每个小组成员都要捍卫自己的假设和解释,并说服其他小组成员接受自己的观点。然后每个小组达成一个共识性意见,并在全班讨论时进行陈述。接着全班对每个小组的假设或解释以及所提出的支持论点的优点进行辩论。起初,学生们对CITE感到担忧,尤其是与同学交流和捍卫观点方面。然而,课程评估显示,137名学生中有131名认为CITE是一次增强学习效果的积极体验。此外,137名学生中有13