Mortensen C J, Nicholson A M
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jul;93(7):3722-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9087.
Many classrooms in higher education still rely on a transformative approach to teaching where students attend lectures and earn course grades through examination. In the modern age, traditional lectures are argued by some as obsolete and do not address the learning needs of today’s students. An emerging pedagogical approach is the concept of the flipped classroom. The flipped classroom can simply be described as students viewing asynchronous video lectures on their own and then engaging in active learning during scheduled class times. In this study, we examined the flipped classroom teaching environment on student learning gains in an Introduction to Equine Science course. Students (n = 130) were asked to view 7.5 h of recorded lectures divided into 8 learning modules, take online quizzes to enforce lecture viewing, take 3 in-class exams, and prepare to participate in active learning during scheduled class times. Active learning approaches included individual activities, paired activities, informal small groups, and large group activities. When compared to students in the traditional lecture format in earlier years, students in the flipped format scored higher on all 3 exams (P < 0.05), with both formats taught by the same instructor. Analysis of ACT scores demonstrated no intellectual capacity differences between the student populations. To evaluate any gains in critical thinking, flipped format students were asked to take the Cornell Critical Thinking Exam (version X). Scores improved from the pretest (50.8 ± 0.57) to the posttest (54.4 ± 0.58; P < 0.01). In the flipped course, no correlations were found with student performance and interactions with online content. Students were asked in class to evaluate their experiences based on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The flipped classroom was ranked as an enjoyable learning experience with a mean of 4.4 ± 0.10, while students responded positively to other pointed questions. In formal course evaluations, flipped format students ranked the following higher (P < 0.05): instructor availability to assist students; encouragement of independent, creative, and critical thinking; and amount learned. Overall, the flipped classroom proved to be a positive learning experience for students. As the classroom continues to modernize, pedagogical approaches such as the flipped classroom should be considered for many lecture-style courses taught in the animal sciences.
高等教育中的许多课堂仍依赖于一种变革性的教学方法,即学生参加讲座并通过考试获得课程成绩。在现代社会,一些人认为传统讲座已过时,无法满足当今学生的学习需求。一种新兴的教学方法是翻转课堂的概念。翻转课堂可以简单地描述为学生自行观看异步视频讲座,然后在预定的上课时间进行主动学习。在本研究中,我们考察了在马科学导论课程中翻转课堂教学环境对学生学习成绩的影响。学生(n = 130)被要求观看7.5小时的录制讲座,这些讲座分为8个学习模块,参加在线测验以督促观看讲座,参加3次课堂考试,并准备在预定的上课时间参与主动学习。主动学习方法包括个人活动、配对活动、非正式小组活动和大组活动。与前几年采用传统讲座形式的学生相比,采用翻转形式的学生在所有3次考试中的得分都更高(P < 0.05),两种形式均由同一位教师授课。对美国大学入学考试(ACT)成绩的分析表明,两组学生在智力能力上没有差异。为了评估批判性思维方面的任何进步,要求采用翻转形式的学生参加康奈尔批判性思维考试(X版)。成绩从预测试(50.8 ± 0.57)提高到后测试(54.4 ± 0.58;P < 0.01)。在翻转课程中,未发现学生表现与在线内容互动之间存在相关性。在课堂上,要求学生根据5点李克特量表评估他们的体验:1(强烈不同意)至5(强烈同意)。翻转课堂被评为一种愉快的学习体验,平均分为4.4 ± 0.10,同时学生对其他具体问题的回答也很积极。在正式的课程评估中,采用翻转形式的学生在以下方面的排名更高(P < 0.05):教师对学生的可及性;对独立、创造性和批判性思维的鼓励;以及所学知识量。总体而言,翻转课堂被证明对学生来说是一种积极的学习体验。随着课堂不断现代化,对于动物科学领域许多讲座式课程而言,应考虑采用诸如翻转课堂这样的教学方法。