Venkatramana Palla, Reddy Palakuru C
Department of Anthropology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(1):66-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2002.00250.x.
The relationship of body mass index (BMI), conicity index (CI) and waist circumference to four coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors (systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels) was examined in urban (n = 110) and rural (n = 102) men aged > or = 20 years, drawn from the 'Reddy' population of Southern Andhra Pradesh, India. Using ANCOVA we found significant difference (< 0.01) for systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol between the urban and rural samples. The Pearson's correlation coefficients suggest that BMI and waist circumference had significant relationships with most of the risk factors in both the populations. The CI did not significantly influence any of the risk factors in the urban population; however, in the rural population, CI did show a significant positive relationship with both of the blood pressures and with TC. Even after controlling for age, smoking and physical activity (partial correlations), the relations remained constant. In multiple linear regression, BMI showed significant positive association with systolic and diastolic blood pressures (<0.01) and HDL cholesterol (<0.05) in the rural population only. However, the Cl showed a significant association with HDL cholesterol, and waist circumference with total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol in the rural population. The results of the present study revealed that BMI and waist circumference had a greater influence on the CHD risk factors, and that the influence was more conspicuous in the rural sample. Comparing the association of abdominal obesity measures (CI and waist circumference) with CHD risk factors, waist circumference better correlated with most of the risk factors. Hence the present study suggests that BMI and waist circumference are better indicators of CHD risk factors. However, the importance of Cl has to be further studied in South Asian populations.
在印度安德拉邦南部的“雷迪”人群中,选取了年龄≥20岁的城市男性(n = 110)和农村男性(n = 102),研究体重指数(BMI)、锥度指数(CI)和腰围与四种冠心病(CHD)危险因素(收缩压和舒张压、总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇水平)之间的关系。通过协方差分析,我们发现城市和农村样本在收缩压、总胆固醇和HDL胆固醇方面存在显著差异(<0.01)。皮尔逊相关系数表明,BMI和腰围与这两个人群中的大多数危险因素都存在显著关系。CI在城市人群中对任何危险因素均无显著影响;然而,在农村人群中,CI与收缩压和舒张压以及总胆固醇均呈显著正相关。即使在控制了年龄、吸烟和身体活动(偏相关)之后,这些关系仍然保持不变。在多元线性回归中,仅在农村人群中,BMI与收缩压和舒张压(<0.01)以及HDL胆固醇(<0.05)呈显著正相关。然而,在农村人群中,CI与HDL胆固醇呈显著相关,腰围与总胆固醇和HDL胆固醇呈显著相关。本研究结果表明,BMI和腰围对冠心病危险因素的影响更大,且在农村样本中这种影响更为明显。比较腹部肥胖测量指标(CI和腰围)与冠心病危险因素的关联,腰围与大多数危险因素的相关性更好。因此,本研究表明BMI和腰围是冠心病危险因素的更好指标。然而,CI在南亚人群中的重要性还有待进一步研究。