Low Bobbi S, Simon Carl P, Anderson Kermyt G
School of Natural Resources and Environment Population Studies Center, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Am J Hum Biol. 2002 Mar-Apr;14(2):149-67. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.10043.
Life history theory postulates tradeoffs of current versus future reproduction; today women face evolutionarily novel versions of these tradeoffs. Optimal age at first birth is the result of tradeoffs in fertility and mortality; ceteris paribus, early reproduction is advantageous. Yet modern women in developed nations experience relatively late first births; they appear to be trading off socioeconomic status and the paths to raised SES, education and work, against early fertility. Here, [1] using delineating parameter values drawn from data in the literature, we model these tradeoffs to determine how much socioeconomic advantage will compensate for delayed first births and lower lifetime fertility; and [2] we examine the effects of work and education on women's lifetime and age-specific fertility using data from seven cohorts in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID).
生命史理论假定了当前生育与未来生育之间的权衡;如今,女性面临着这些权衡的进化新颖版本。首次生育的最佳年龄是生育力与死亡率之间权衡的结果;在其他条件相同的情况下,早育是有利的。然而,发达国家的现代女性首次生育相对较晚;她们似乎在将社会经济地位以及提升社会经济地位、教育和工作的途径,与早育进行权衡。在此,[1]我们利用从文献数据中划定的参数值,对这些权衡进行建模,以确定多少社会经济优势能够弥补首次生育延迟和终身生育力降低的影响;[2]我们使用收入动态面板研究(PSID)中七个队列的数据,研究工作和教育对女性终身生育力及特定年龄生育力的影响。