Suppr超能文献

胸部放疗摆位的准确性:对24例接受肺癌放疗患者的前瞻性分析。

Accuracy of set-up of thoracic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 24 patients treated with radiotherapy for lung cancer.

作者信息

Essapen S, Knowles C, Norman A, Tait D

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2002 Feb;75(890):162-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.890.750162.

Abstract

In thoracic radiotherapy, a number of factors hinder the use of portal films and electronic portal imaging devices for measuring field placement errors (FPEs). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of treatment set-up using simulator check films (SCFs) in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Prospective evaluation was performed on 24 patients. During their radiotherapy, patients returned to the simulator weekly for a minimum of four SCFs, for which the parameters from the original simulator planning film were set, positioning being achieved without fluoroscopy. A total of 96 SCFs were taken. FPEs in left-right (L-R) and superior-inferior (S-I) direction, as well as coronal rotational errors, were measured. The mean absolute FPE was 0.35 cm in the L-R axis and 0.43 cm in the S-I axis. Statistically, the FPEs in the S-I direction were greater than those in the L-R direction (p<0.001). A margin of 0.93 cm between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume would cover 95% of FPEs in the L-R direction, whilst a margin of 1.13 cm is needed for this degree of certainty in the S-I direction. Mean coronal rotational error was 1.6 degrees. Systematic errors were greater than random errors. This study demonstrated that the FPEs were within clinical tolerance (< or = 0.7 cm) in 84.9% of the measurements. The planning margins used in our clinical practice compare favourably with the FPEs in this study.

摘要

在胸部放疗中,有许多因素阻碍使用射野片和电子射野成像设备来测量射野摆位误差(FPE)。本研究的目的是评估在肺癌放疗中使用模拟定位机校验片(SCF)进行治疗摆位的准确性。对24例患者进行了前瞻性评估。在放疗期间,患者每周返回模拟定位机进行至少四张SCF拍摄,拍摄时设置为与原始模拟定位机计划片相同的参数,且不使用透视进行定位。共获取了96张SCF。测量了左右(L-R)和上下(S-I)方向的FPE以及冠状面旋转误差。L-R轴上的平均绝对FPE为0.35 cm,S-I轴上为0.43 cm。统计学上,S-I方向的FPE大于L-R方向(p<0.001)。临床靶区与计划靶区之间0.93 cm的边界可覆盖L-R方向95%的FPE,而在S-I方向需要1.13 cm的边界才能达到相同的确定性程度。平均冠状面旋转误差为1.6度。系统误差大于随机误差。本研究表明,84.9%的测量中FPE在临床可接受范围内(≤0.7 cm)。我们临床实践中使用的计划边界与本研究中的FPE相比具有优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验