Viswanathan Sowmya, Benatar Tania, Rose-John Stefan, Lauffenburger Doug A, Zandstra Peter W
Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Roseburgh Building, University of Toronto, 4 Taddle Creek Road, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G9, Canada.
Stem Cells. 2002;20(2):119-38. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.20-2-119.
We previously demonstrated that embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal required sustained signaling by leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in a concentration-dependent manner, allowing us to hypothesize that thresholds in ligand-receptor signaling modulate stem cell differentiation control. To test this hypothesis, we have experimentally and computationally compared the abilities of two gp130-signaling cytokines (LIF and Hyper-interleukin-6 [HIL-6]) to sustain ES cell self-renewal. Quantitative measurements of ES cell phenotypic markers (stage-specific embryonic antigen-1 and E-cadherin), functional assays (alkaline phosphatase activity and embryoid body formation efficiency), and transcription factor (Oct-4) expression over a range of LIF and HIL-6 concentrations demonstrated a superior ability of LIF to maintain ES cell pluripotentiality at higher concentrations (> or =500 pM). Additionally, we observed distinct qualitative differences in the ES cell self-renewal dose response profiles between the two cytokines. A computational model permitted calculation of the number of signaling complexes as a function of receptor expression, ligand concentration, and ligand/receptor-binding properties, generating predictions for the degree of self-renewal as a function of cytokine concentration by comparison of these calculated complex numbers to experimentally determined threshold cytokine concentrations. Model predictions, consistent with experimental data, indicated that differences in the potencies of these two cytokines were based primarily on differences in receptor-binding stoichiometries and properties. These results support a ligand/receptor signaling threshold model of ES cell fate modulation through appropriate types and levels of cytokine stimulation. Insights from these results may be more generally applicable to tissue-specific stem cells and could aid in the development of stem cell-based technologies.
我们之前证明,胚胎干细胞(ES细胞)的自我更新需要白血病抑制因子(LIF)以浓度依赖的方式持续发出信号,这使我们能够假设配体-受体信号传导中的阈值调节干细胞分化控制。为了验证这一假设,我们通过实验和计算比较了两种gp130信号细胞因子(LIF和超白细胞介素6 [HIL-6])维持ES细胞自我更新的能力。在一系列LIF和HIL-6浓度下,对ES细胞表型标志物(阶段特异性胚胎抗原-1和E-钙黏蛋白)进行定量测量、进行功能测定(碱性磷酸酶活性和胚状体形成效率)以及转录因子(Oct-4)表达分析,结果表明LIF在较高浓度(≥500 pM)时维持ES细胞多能性的能力更强。此外,我们观察到两种细胞因子之间ES细胞自我更新剂量反应曲线存在明显的定性差异。一个计算模型允许根据受体表达、配体浓度和配体/受体结合特性计算信号复合物的数量,通过将这些计算出的复合物数量与实验确定的阈值细胞因子浓度进行比较,生成自我更新程度作为细胞因子浓度函数的预测。与实验数据一致的模型预测表明,这两种细胞因子效力的差异主要基于受体结合化学计量和特性的差异。这些结果支持通过适当类型和水平的细胞因子刺激来调节ES细胞命运的配体/受体信号阈值模型。这些结果得出的见解可能更广泛地适用于组织特异性干细胞,并有助于基于干细胞的技术的发展。