• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危患者血脂异常的管理。

Managing dyslipidemia in the high-risk patient.

作者信息

Stein Evan A

机构信息

Medical Research Laboratories International, Highland Heights, Kentucky 41076, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2002 Mar 7;89(5A):50C-57C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02229-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02229-4
PMID:11900720
Abstract

Lipid-lowering agents have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in all patients. However, these agents are more cost-effective in high-risk patients whose absolute risk of CAD is greater than that of low-risk patients. Furthermore, from preliminary data, it appears that there is greater risk reduction in those subjects achieving lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (ie, lower is better). The identification and aggressive treatment of these patients should therefore be a high priority for clinicians. Guidelines from medical organizations, such as the Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III of the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), emphasize that patients with CAD, diabetes, or global risk of CAD >20% over 10 years and LDL-C levels >130 mg/dL should receive drug therapy with a goal of reducing LDL-C levels to <100 mg/dL. The recent results of the United Kingdom's Heart Protection Study (HPS) strongly suggest that even those with CAD or who are at high risk and LDL-C levels >100 mg/dL would benefit from drug therapy. Although optimal LDL-C levels have been set at <100 mg/dL for high-risk patients, recent studies show only about 20% of such patients meet these goals. Thus, a large treatment gap remains that needs to be overcome if we are to continue to make significant inroads into preventing further morbidity and mortality in these high-risk subjects. Of therapeutic options available currently and for the near future, statins remain the most effective and well-tolerated form of lipid-lowering therapy. Other therapies include bile acid sequestrants, niacin, and plant stanols. However, none of these is, in general, sufficiently effective as an initial agent to achieve these more aggressive LDL-C goals in the high-risk patient. However, combination therapy with a statin and 1 of these other lipid-lowering agents is useful in patients who are unable to achieve lipid goals on monotherapy. A number of agents for reducing LDL-C levels currently in development may be available in the near future, including 2 new statins: pitavastatin and rosuvastatin. Rosuvastatin, which is in the later stages of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process, has been shown to produce significantly greater reductions in LDL-C levels compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin, and allows more patients to meet lipid goals. Ezetimibe, the first of an entirely new class of LDL-C-lowering agents that inhibit intestinal cholesterol absorption, also appears to offer significant therapeutic value. It is anticipated that these new options will allow clinicians to optimize the management of dyslipidemia in high-risk patients, thereby further reducing the morbidity and mortality of CAD.

摘要

降脂药物已被证明可降低所有患者与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)相关的发病率和死亡率。然而,这些药物在CAD绝对风险高于低风险患者的高危患者中更具成本效益。此外,从初步数据来看,似乎那些低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平降低幅度更大的受试者风险降低幅度更大(即越低越好)。因此,识别并积极治疗这些患者应是临床医生的首要任务。美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)成人治疗小组(ATP)III等医学组织的指南强调,患有CAD、糖尿病或10年CAD全球风险>20%且LDL-C水平>130mg/dL的患者应接受药物治疗,目标是将LDL-C水平降至<100mg/dL。英国心脏保护研究(HPS)的最新结果强烈表明,即使是那些患有CAD或处于高危状态且LDL-C水平>100mg/dL的患者也将从药物治疗中获益。尽管高危患者的最佳LDL-C水平已设定为<100mg/dL,但最近的研究表明,这类患者中只有约20%达到了这些目标。因此,如果我们要继续在预防这些高危受试者的进一步发病和死亡方面取得重大进展,仍有一个巨大的治疗差距需要克服。在目前及不久的将来可用的治疗选择中,他汀类药物仍然是最有效且耐受性良好的降脂治疗形式。其他疗法包括胆汁酸螯合剂、烟酸和植物甾醇。然而,一般来说,这些药物作为初始药物都不足以有效实现高危患者更积极的LDL-C目标。然而,对于单药治疗无法达到血脂目标的患者,他汀类药物与这些其他降脂药物之一的联合治疗是有用的。目前正在研发的一些降低LDL-C水平的药物可能在不久的将来上市,包括两种新型他汀类药物:匹伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀。瑞舒伐他汀正处于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准程序的后期阶段,与阿托伐他汀、辛伐他汀和普伐他汀相比,已显示出能显著更大幅度地降低LDL-C水平,并使更多患者达到血脂目标。依泽替米贝是全新一类抑制肠道胆固醇吸收的降低LDL-C药物中的第一种,似乎也具有显著的治疗价值。预计这些新的选择将使临床医生能够优化高危患者血脂异常的管理,从而进一步降低CAD的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
Managing dyslipidemia in the high-risk patient.高危患者血脂异常的管理。
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Mar 7;89(5A):50C-57C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02229-4.
2
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and LDL-C goal attainment among elderly patients treated with rosuvastatin compared with other statins in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中,与其他他汀类药物相比,瑞舒伐他汀治疗的老年患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平及LDL-C达标情况。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.002.
3
Guidelines for lowering lipids to reduce coronary artery disease risk: a comparison of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin for achieving lipid-lowering goals.降低血脂以降低冠状动脉疾病风险的指南:瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和辛伐他汀在实现降脂目标方面的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 6;91(5A):11C-17C; discussion 17C-19C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00004-3.
4
Management of dyslipidemia in the high-risk patient.高危患者血脂异常的管理。
Am Heart J. 2002 Dec;144(6 Suppl):S43-50. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.130302.
5
Lipid levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in diabetic patients: rosuvastatin compared with other statins in usual care.糖尿病患者的血脂水平及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇达标情况:瑞舒伐他汀与常规治疗中其他他汀类药物的比较
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Apr;9(5):669-76. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.5.669.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cholesterol-lowering therapies in Spain.西班牙降胆固醇疗法的成本效益分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2006;6(3):177-88. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200606030-00005.
7
Changes in LDL-C levels and goal attainment associated with addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin compared with titrating statin monotherapy.与他汀类单药治疗滴定相比,依折麦布联合辛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀治疗时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平的变化及目标达成情况。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:719-27. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S49840. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
Achieving and maintaining National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with five statins.使用五种他汀类药物实现并维持国家胆固醇教育计划的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标
Am J Med. 2001 Aug 15;111(3):185-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00799-9.
9
More Western hypercholesterolemic patients achieve Japan Atherosclerosis Society LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin therapy than with atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin therapy.与阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀或辛伐他汀治疗相比,更多西方高胆固醇血症患者使用瑞舒伐他汀治疗可达到日本动脉粥样硬化协会的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标。
Circ J. 2004 Feb;68(2):107-13. doi: 10.1253/circj.68.107.
10
Lipid and apolipoprotein ratios: association with coronary artery disease and effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin.脂质和载脂蛋白比率:与冠状动脉疾病的关联以及瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和辛伐他汀相比的效果
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 6;91(5A):20C-23C; discussion 23C-24C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00005-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Is combined lipid-regulating therapy safe and feasible for the very old patients with mixed dyslipidemia?联合调脂治疗对高龄混合性血脂异常患者是否安全可行?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013 Dec;10(4):349-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.04.014.
2
The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients.依折麦布与小剂量辛伐他汀作为肾移植受者血脂异常初始治疗的疗效和安全性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(3):233-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.3.233. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
3
Evaluation of a new formulation of fenofibric acid, ABT-335, co-administered with statins : study design and rationale of a phase III clinical programme.
非诺贝特酸新制剂ABT - 335与他汀类药物联合使用的评估:一项III期临床项目的研究设计与原理
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(10):625-34. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828100-00003.
4
Efficacy and safety of statins in hypercholesterolemia with emphasis on lipoproteins.他汀类药物在高胆固醇血症中的疗效与安全性,重点关注脂蛋白。
Heart Vessels. 2005 Sep;20(5):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s00380-005-0836-6.
5
Ineffectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in primary care.基层医疗中降脂治疗的无效性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;59(4):456-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02266.x.