• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'Horses for Courses': the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to research.

作者信息

Redmond Anthony C, Keenan Anne-Maree, Landorf Karl

机构信息

Lower Extremity and Podiatry (LEAP) Research Group, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 Mar;92(3):159-69. doi: 10.7547/87507315-92-3-159.

DOI:10.7547/87507315-92-3-159
PMID:11904331
Abstract

Some clinicians may feel dissociated from, and intimidated by the ever-increasing emphasis on research. However, with an understanding of some of the basic principles and key terms, research can feel less daunting. It is the aim of this article, the second in a series of three focusing on understanding research, to introduce clinicians to the different approaches to research, to improve understanding of what the approaches mean, and to highlight when a particular approach may be appropriate. Furthermore, the article will provide an explanation of some of the common terms used within clinical research. This should aid the clinician in applying good, simple, scientific principles to evaluating clinical research evidence.

摘要

相似文献

1
'Horses for Courses': the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to research.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 Mar;92(3):159-69. doi: 10.7547/87507315-92-3-159.
2
Understanding statistics. Putting p-values into perspective.理解统计学。正确看待P值。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 May;92(5):297-305. doi: 10.7547/87507315-92-5-297.
3
Qualitative science policy.定性科学政策
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1434-41. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308951.
4
Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: positivism and phenomenology.
Phys Ther. 1993 Feb;73(2):88-97; discussion 98-101. doi: 10.1093/ptj/73.2.88.
5
Introduction to qualitative research.定性研究导论。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002 Jan-Feb;25(1):10-4. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200201000-00004.
6
[Criteria of scientific validity in research].[研究中的科学有效性标准]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2002 Mar(68):35-42.
7
Reconstructing Root. An argument for objectivity.重构根源。关于客观性的一种论证。
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2001 Oct;18(4):691-702, vi.
8
Adding Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research to Health Intervention Studies: Interacting With Differences.将定性和混合方法研究纳入健康干预研究:应对差异
Qual Health Res. 2016 Apr;26(5):587-602. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617479. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Objectivity and subjectivity in the ethnographic method.人种志方法中的客观性与主观性。
Qual Health Res. 2005 May;15(5):647-68. doi: 10.1177/1049732304273933.
10
How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.当我们看到“好的”定性研究时,我们如何识别它?开启卫生服务研究中的对话。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol Writing in Clinical Research.临床研究中的方案撰写
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):ZE10-ZE13. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21426.8865. Epub 2016 Nov 1.