Suppr超能文献

基于人体血管紧张素II剂量反应的血管紧张素II 1型拮抗剂厄贝沙坦和坎地沙坦的药效学研究。

Pharmacodynamic studies on the angiotensin II type 1 antagonists irbesartan and candesartan based on angiotensin II dose response in humans.

作者信息

Belz Gustav G, Butzer Raunhild, Kober Susan, Mutschler Ernst

机构信息

Center for Cardiovascular Pharmacology, ZeKaPha GmbH, Alwinenstrasse 16, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2002 Apr;39(4):561-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200204000-00012.

Abstract

The in vivo effects of two unsurmountable angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) antagonists, irbesartan (150 mg) and candesartan (8 mg), were studied in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy men. The drugs' direct vascular effects were assessed as the rightward shift (dose ratio - 1) of angiotensin dose-effect curves on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Renal and adrenal effects were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentrations, and antagonistic concentration equivalents (n x Ki) in a radioligand rat lung receptor assay. Both drugs exerted similar substantial (> 30-fold) and long-lasting (> 2-fold 47 h after dosing) rightward shifts of the angiotensin II dose effect declining with half-lives of 15 h irbesartan and 12 h candesartan, respectively. Dose ratio - 1 versus n x Ki showed a linear relationship in Schild regression plots; both drugs increased PRA, decreased DBP, and suppressed aldosterone. The slopes of linear relationship between angiotensin antagonism (dose ratio - 1) and PRA increase were almost threefold steeper (p = 0.005) following irbesartan as compared with candesartan. The findings suggest that for the same degree of angiotensin II antagonism, irbesartan produces a greater increase in PRA than candesartan. These pharmacodynamic differences warrant further investigation and clarification.

摘要

在一项针对18名健康男性的双盲、随机、交叉研究中,研究了两种不可逾越的血管紧张素II 1型(AT1)拮抗剂厄贝沙坦(150毫克)和坎地沙坦(8毫克)的体内效应。通过血管紧张素剂量-效应曲线在舒张压(DBP)上的右移(剂量比 - 1)来评估药物的直接血管效应。通过血浆肾素活性(PRA)、醛固酮浓度以及放射性配体大鼠肺受体测定中的拮抗浓度当量(n x Ki)来评估肾脏和肾上腺效应。两种药物均使血管紧张素II剂量效应产生相似的大幅(> 30倍)且持久(给药后47小时> 2倍)的右移,厄贝沙坦和坎地沙坦的半衰期分别为15小时和12小时。在Schild回归图中,剂量比 - 1与n x Ki呈线性关系;两种药物均增加PRA、降低DBP并抑制醛固酮。与坎地沙坦相比,厄贝沙坦治疗后血管紧张素拮抗作用(剂量比 - 1)与PRA升高之间线性关系的斜率几乎陡了三倍(p = 0.005)。研究结果表明,在相同程度的血管紧张素II拮抗作用下,厄贝沙坦比坎地沙坦使PRA升高幅度更大。这些药效学差异值得进一步研究和阐明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验