Kunstmann W, Butzlaff M, Böcken J
Universität Witten/Herdecke, Fakultät für Medizin, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Mar;64(3):170-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-22318.
Due to discussions on the cost and quality of health care and a new legislation on the German statutory sickness insurance system in 1999, the free choice of doctors has recently become topical. To assess its legitimation for the German health care system, its history and the groups of interest involved should be taken into consideration. Before the period of industrialization no homogeneous pattern of the medical profession existed. In case of illness individuals who lived within reach and were known for their competence in disease matters were approached. However, industrialization destroyed existing social networks, and establishment of new structures of health care in rural as well as metropolitan areas became necessary. The government approached this challenge by structuring medical education, passing regulations on the settlement of doctors and promoting the foundation of statutory sickness funds. The Health Insurance Law of 1883 established a mandatory insurance system for a broad array of industries. As it was the sickness funds' responsibility to provide sufficient resources for medical care, a sick member was tied to the physician under contract with his insurance. After a rapid increase in practising physicians at the end of the 19(th) century, doctors' organisations were eager to gain access to the new market segment of insurance members by calling for the free choice of physicians. The Leipzig association (Hartmannbund) was founded in 1900 to organize strikes of doctors in order to get their goals accepted. After 30 years of conflicts an appeasement was achieved by a presidential emergency law in 1931. It transferred the responsibility for the provision of sufficient health care resources from the sickness funds to the newly created body of the Association of Sickness Fund Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung) and determined the patients' free choice among licensed sickness fund physicians.
由于对医疗保健成本和质量的讨论以及1999年德国法定医疗保险制度的一项新立法,医生自由选择问题最近成为热门话题。为了评估其在德国医疗保健系统中的合理性,应该考虑其历史以及所涉及的利益群体。在工业化时期之前,不存在统一的医学职业模式。生病时,人们会去找住得近且在疾病问题上有能力的熟人。然而,工业化破坏了现有的社会网络,因此有必要在农村和城市地区建立新的医疗保健结构。政府通过规范医学教育、制定医生执业规定以及推动法定疾病基金的建立来应对这一挑战。1883年的《健康保险法》为众多行业建立了强制保险制度。由于提供医疗保健资源是疾病基金的责任,患病成员只能找与他的保险公司签订合同的医生看病。在19世纪末执业医生数量迅速增加之后,医生组织渴望通过呼吁医生自由选择来进入保险成员这个新的市场领域。1900年成立了莱比锡协会(哈特曼联盟),组织医生罢工以使其目标得到认可。经过30年的冲突,1931年通过一项总统紧急法令达成了和解。该法令将提供充足医疗保健资源的责任从疾病基金转移到新成立的疾病基金医生协会,并确定了患者在获得许可的疾病基金医生之间的自由选择权。