Quantitative examination of neurological function: reliability and learning effects.

During the last five years, a battery of tests measuring neurological function called the Quantitative Examination of Neurological Function (QENF) has been greatly expanded. To evaluate more effectively the efficacy of clinical trials, the results of a study on reliability of test measures and on long- and short-term effects of learning are reported. Of the 113 test measures that were evaluated using 18 young adult normal subjects, only the fatigue and error measures, the vibration sense and two simulated activities of daily living tests were found unreliable. With respect to learning, the largest improvements in performance were found for arm-shoulder pursuit tracking, followed by many of the tests of coordination, particularly those requiring manual and/or finger dexterity. Only slight changes were found for tests of vision, strength, and speed of hand and foot. There were no important differences between short- and long-term learning. Considering this and other studies, patients are not likely to improve their performance appreciably by learning in a clinical trial.