• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[糖尿病对接受冠状动脉支架置入术患者的初始及长期预后的影响]

[Influence of diabetes mellitus on the initial and long-term outcome of patients treated with coronary stenting].

作者信息

Tanigawa Takashi, Ishiwata Sugao, Yamamoto Takanobu, Fujimoto Yoh, Nameki Mizuo, Koizumi Tomomi, Iwase Takashi, Nishiyama Shin-ichiro, Nakanishi Shigemoto, Momomura Shin-ichi

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Toranomon Hospital, Toranomon 2-2-2, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8470.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2002 Mar;39(3):133-40.

PMID:11912947
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The long-term outcome of patients with diabetes who underwent stent placement has not been assessed comprehensively.

METHODS

Analysis of angioplasty procedures performed between January 1994 and December 1998 identified 140 diabetics (156 lesions) and 169 non-diabetics (187 lesions) who underwent successful stent placement. Follow-up was completed in 286 patients (93%) with a mean follow-up period of 2.8 +/- 1.3 years. Cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting and repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were considered as adverse cardiac events. The primary clinical endpoint was event-free survival at 1 and 3 years. The primary angiographic endpoint was restenosis rate at follow-up angiography (follow-up rate 75% of 257 lesions).

RESULTS

The diabetics were older (66 +/- 8 vs 62 +/- 11 years, p < 0.0005) with more risk factors such as hypertension (69% vs 57%, p < 0.05) and multivessel disease (69% vs 51%, p < 0.005). Final balloon size was smaller in diabetics than in non-diabetics (3.26 +/- 0.61 vs 3.39 +/- 0.53 mm, p < 0.05). Restenosis rate was significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics (36% vs 24%, p < 0.05), but the target lesion revascularization in diabetics was not statistically different compared with non-diabetics (22% vs 16%). Long-term event-free survival was not significantly different between diabetics and non-diabetics (69.9% vs 74.8% at 1 year, 57.3% vs 66.0% at 3 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetics have an increased risk for angiographical restenosis after successful stent placement compared to non-diabetics. However, diabetics who underwent stent placement had a favorable clinical long-term outcome similar to non-diabetics.

摘要

目的

尚未对接受支架置入术的糖尿病患者的长期预后进行全面评估。

方法

分析1994年1月至1998年12月期间进行的血管成形术,确定140例糖尿病患者(156处病变)和169例非糖尿病患者(187处病变)成功接受了支架置入术。286例患者(93%)完成随访,平均随访期为2.8±1.3年。心脏死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、冠状动脉旁路移植术和重复经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术被视为不良心脏事件。主要临床终点是1年和3年时的无事件生存率。主要血管造影终点是随访血管造影时的再狭窄率(257处病变的随访率为75%)。

结果

糖尿病患者年龄较大(66±8岁对62±11岁,p<0.0005),有更多危险因素,如高血压(69%对57%,p<0.05)和多支血管病变(69%对51%,p<0.005)。糖尿病患者的最终球囊尺寸小于非糖尿病患者(3.26±0.61对3.39±0.53mm,p<0.05)。糖尿病患者的再狭窄率显著高于非糖尿病患者(36%对24%,p<0.05),但糖尿病患者的靶病变血运重建与非糖尿病患者相比无统计学差异(22%对16%)。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的长期无事件生存率无显著差异(1年时为69.9%对74.8%,3年时为57.3%对66.0%)。

结论

与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者成功置入支架后血管造影再狭窄风险增加。然而,接受支架置入术的糖尿病患者的临床长期预后与非糖尿病患者相似,较为良好。

相似文献

1
[Influence of diabetes mellitus on the initial and long-term outcome of patients treated with coronary stenting].[糖尿病对接受冠状动脉支架置入术患者的初始及长期预后的影响]
J Cardiol. 2002 Mar;39(3):133-40.
2
Comparison of long-term (seven year) outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization with versus without stenting.接受经皮冠状动脉血运重建术并置入支架与未置入支架患者的长期(七年)结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;97(10):1467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.036. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
3
Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stenting.帕尔马兹-沙茨支架置入术后的三年临床随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1185-91. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00574-9.
4
Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience.多支冠状动脉支架置入术与搭桥手术的临床和经济结果比较:美国单中心经验
Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):334-42. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.38.
5
Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty.冠状动脉支架对死亡率和非致死性心肌梗死的影响:比较常规支架置入策略与球囊血管成形术策略的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2004 May;147(5):815-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.025.
6
[Comparative study of coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients. Immediate clinical and angiographic results and clinical evolution in the first year of follow up].糖尿病患者冠状动脉血管成形术的对比研究。即刻临床及血管造影结果以及随访第一年的临床进展
Rev Med Chil. 2001 Aug;129(8):861-70.
7
Two-year clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents for diabetic patients with de novo coronary lesions: results from a real-world multicenter registry.药物洗脱支架治疗初发冠状动脉病变糖尿病患者的两年临床结局:一项真实世界多中心注册研究结果
Circulation. 2008 Feb 19;117(7):923-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.730416. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
8
Efficacy of stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in 297 patients.297例无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者支架置入术的疗效
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Apr 5;119(7):544-50.
9
Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis from 5 randomized trials.糖尿病患者使用紫杉醇洗脱冠状动脉支架:来自5项随机试验的汇总分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 19;51(7):708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.035.
10
[Drug-eluting stents for diabetic patients. A critical appraisal of the currently available data from randomized trials].[糖尿病患者的药物洗脱支架。对随机试验现有数据的批判性评估]
Herz. 2008 Apr;33(3):196-205. doi: 10.1007/s00059-008-3121-5.