Suppr超能文献

为什么结构化面试在人员选拔中很少被使用?

Why are structured interviews so rarely used in personnel selection?

作者信息

van der Zee Karen I, Bakker Arnold B, Bakker Paulien

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):176-84. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.176.

Abstract

By adopting the theory of planned behavior, this study tried to predict human resources managers' (N = 79) intentions toward unstructured and structured interview techniques. Managers evaluated case descriptions of both techniques and were interviewed about their own practices. The data revealed stronger intentions toward unstructured interviewing than toward structured interviewing, which was consistent with their own practices in selecting staff, which appeared to be rather unstructured. l. Ajzen's (1991) theory appeared to be a useful framework for predicting managers' intentions. In particular, attitudes and subjective norms were predictive of intentions to engage in either method. Only intentions toward the unstructured case were related to managers' actual behavior.

摘要

通过采用计划行为理论,本研究试图预测人力资源经理(N = 79)对非结构化和结构化面试技术的意向。经理们对两种技术的案例描述进行了评估,并就他们自己的实践接受了访谈。数据显示,与结构化面试相比,经理们对非结构化面试的意向更强,这与他们在选拔员工时的实际做法一致,他们的选拔做法似乎相当缺乏结构化。I. 阿杰恩(1991)的理论似乎是预测经理们意向的一个有用框架。特别是,态度和主观规范能够预测采用这两种方法的意向。只有对非结构化案例的意向与经理们的实际行为相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验