Casati Andrea, Borghi Battista, Fanelli Guido, Cerchierini Elisa, Santorsola Roberta, Sassoli Valeria, Grispigni Crispino, Torri Giorgio
Department of Anesthesiology, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Anesth Analg. 2002 Apr;94(4):987-90, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200204000-00039.
To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofol infusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.
No studies have compared the clinical properties of levobupivacaine with those of ropivacaine when providing sciatic nerve block for hallux valgus repair. Results from this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrate that 20 mL of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical block with prolonged postoperative analgesia.
为比较左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因用于坐骨神经阻滞的术中及术后临床特性,50例拟行拇外翻修复术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级患者接受了15毫升2%甲哌卡因的股神经阻滞。然后,他们被随机双盲分配,分别接受0.5%左旋布比卡因(n = 25)或0.5%罗哌卡因(n = 25)的坐骨神经阻滞。一名独立的盲法观察者评估了手术麻醉的起效时间以及手术阻滞和术后镇痛的质量。左旋布比卡因组坐骨神经分布区域手术阻滞的中位(范围)起效时间为30分钟(5 - 60分钟),罗哌卡因组为15分钟(5 - 60分钟)(P = 0.63)。4例患者(每组2例)在手术开始前由外科医生进行了补充踝关节阻滞。所有4例患者还接受了静脉注射芬太尼补充,但其中3例需要丙泊酚输注才能完成手术(左旋布比卡因组2例[8%],罗哌卡因组1例[4%];P = 0.99)。左旋布比卡因组6例患者(24%)和罗哌卡因组5例患者(20%)需要静脉注射芬太尼补充才能完成手术(P = 0.99)。两组之间感觉和运动功能恢复时间无差异,而左旋布比卡因组术后镇痛的中位(范围)持续时间为16小时(8 - 24小时),罗哌卡因组为16小时(8 - 24小时)(P = 0.83)。我们得出结论,0.5%左旋布比卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因提供了相当的手术麻醉和术后镇痛效果。
在为拇外翻修复术提供坐骨神经阻滞时,尚无研究比较左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因的临床特性。这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究的结果表明,20毫升0.5%左旋布比卡因或0.5%罗哌卡因均可提供相当的手术阻滞,并具有延长的术后镇痛效果。