Bourne C P
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1975 Oct;63(4):366-77.
In an era of steady-state budgets many research and academic libraries must cancel a significant number of current serials to maintain acquisitions of monographs. Thus paper reviews several techniques that have been used or that are of potential use in a rational selection of titles for cancellation. The context of the proposed methodology involves a network of libraries rather than an individual library. The methodology was tested with specific health sciences serial titles held by University of California libraries and resource libraries in NLM Region XI. As a test for the proposed methodology, background data were collected on 600 current foreign language serial titles included in SERLINE and held by at least one of the libraries in the networks of interest. Price, major secondary service coverage with productivity/impact factors, extent of holdings, and average number of recorded circulations per year in several of the libraries were recorded for each title. With the use of several different rules, estimates were made of the subscription savings that might be realized. It seems feasible to extend the same methodology to other groups of serial titles.
在预算稳定的时代,许多研究图书馆和学术图书馆必须取消大量现有的连续出版物,以维持专著的采购。因此,本文探讨了几种已被使用或可能用于合理选择取消图书的技术。所提出方法的背景是图书馆网络,而非单个图书馆。该方法通过加利福尼亚大学图书馆和国家医学图书馆第十一区的资源图书馆持有的特定健康科学连续出版物进行了测试。作为对所提方法的检验,收集了关于600种当前外语连续出版物的背景数据,这些出版物包含在SERLINE中,且由相关网络中的至少一个图书馆持有。记录了每种图书的价格、主要二级服务覆盖范围及生产力/影响因素、馆藏范围以及几个图书馆每年的平均记录流通量。使用几种不同规则,估算了可能实现的订阅节省。将相同方法扩展到其他连续出版物组似乎是可行的。