Kind Peter C, Mitchell Donald E, Ahmed Bashir, Blakemore Colin, Bonhoeffer Tobias, Sengpiel Frank
University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):430-3. doi: 10.1038/416430a.
Monocular deprivation (MD) has much more rapid and severe effects on the ocular dominance of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) than does binocular deprivation. This finding underlies the widely held hypothesis that the developmental plasticity of ocular dominance reflects competitive interactions for synaptic space between inputs from the two eyes. According to this view, the relative levels of evoked activity in afferents representing the two eyes determine functional changes in response to altered visual experience. However, if the deprived eye of a monocularly deprived kitten is simply reopened, there is substantial physiological and behavioural recovery, leading to the suggestion that absolute activity levels, or some other non-competitive mechanisms, determine the degree of recovery from MD. Here we provide evidence that correlated binocular input is essential for such recovery. Recovery is far less complete if the two eyes are misaligned after a period of MD. This is a powerful demonstration of the importance of cooperative, associative mechanisms in the developing visual cortex.
单眼剥夺(MD)对初级视觉皮层(V1)中神经元的眼优势的影响比双眼剥夺要迅速和严重得多。这一发现支撑了一个被广泛接受的假说,即眼优势的发育可塑性反映了来自双眼的输入之间对突触空间的竞争性相互作用。根据这一观点,代表双眼的传入神经中诱发活动的相对水平决定了对改变的视觉体验的功能变化。然而,如果单眼剥夺小猫的被剥夺眼被简单地重新睁开,会有显著的生理和行为恢复,这表明绝对活动水平或其他一些非竞争性机制决定了从单眼剥夺中恢复的程度。在这里,我们提供证据表明双眼相关输入对于这种恢复至关重要。如果在一段时间的单眼剥夺后双眼出现错位,恢复就远不那么完全。这有力地证明了发育中的视觉皮层中合作性、关联性机制的重要性。