Sluga M, Windhager R, Pfeiffer M, Dominkus M, Kotz R
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Vienna, Austria.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):249-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.12347.
We treated 106 patients with a peripheral osteoid osteoma by conventional surgical methods; 81 had curettage and 25 en-bloc resection. The rate of local recurrence after curettage was 12% and after en-bloc resection 4.5%. Postoperative fractures were observed in 3% after curettage and in 4.5% after en-bloc resection. We compared our findings with those reported in the literature after minimally invasive treatment and concluded that curettage can be regarded as the treatment of choice in patients in whom minimally invasive methods do not offer any advantage, for example, for subperiosteal tumours which are readily accessible, or when the diagnosis is unclear and further histological analysis is required.
我们采用传统手术方法治疗了106例周围型骨样骨瘤患者;81例行刮除术,25例行整块切除术。刮除术后局部复发率为12%,整块切除术后为4.5%。刮除术后3%的患者出现术后骨折,整块切除术后为4.5%。我们将我们研究结果与文献中报道的微创治疗后的结果进行了比较,得出结论:对于那些微创方法没有任何优势的患者,例如对于易于触及的骨膜下肿瘤,或者诊断不明确且需要进一步组织学分析的患者,刮除术可被视为首选治疗方法。