Suppr超能文献

用于评估生物医学信息系统的TEAM方法

The TEAM methodology for the evaluation of information systems in biomedicine.

作者信息

Grant Andrew, Plante Ianik, Leblanc Fréderic

机构信息

Centre for Research and Evaluation in Diagnostics, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, 3001 12th Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1H 5N4.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2002 May;32(3):195-207. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00015-x.

Abstract

The TEAM evaluation methodology for information systems in biomedicine (Total Evaluation and Acceptance Methodology) is a unifying methodology for any computer-based information system based on a three dimensional framework; these dimensions being Role, Time and Structure. The theory is derived from how the information system relates to the general system where it should operate, the properties of information flow within a general system and the relation between a system and its models. As a system can in theory be modelled from many perspectives, a perspective to be modelled is built up by formulating criteria relevant to that perspective which can be evaluated by quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. Key characteristics of the methodology include the insistence on a global rather than partial approach to the evaluation of information systems, also the dynamic nature of an information system which is continually in modification as it more successfully deals with the inherent complexity of the environment in which it is operating. The role dimension identifies four main categories, designer, specialist user, end user and stakeholder from which several sub-categories may be identified. The time dimension has four main phases towards relative stability of the information system. The structural dimension distinguishes strategic, tactical or organisational and operational levels that often are confused together with risk of dilution in current approaches. It is believed that this framework and methodology can provide a basis for future standardisation of evaluation methodologies.

摘要

生物医学信息系统的TEAM评估方法(全面评估与验收方法)是一种基于三维框架的、适用于任何计算机化信息系统的统一方法;这三个维度分别是角色、时间和结构。该理论源自信息系统与它所运行的通用系统之间的关系、通用系统内信息流的特性以及系统与其模型之间的关系。由于理论上一个系统可以从多个角度进行建模,所以要通过制定与该角度相关的标准来构建一个待建模的角度,这些标准可以通过定量和定性评估方法进行评估。该方法的关键特性包括坚持对信息系统进行全局而非局部的评估方法,以及信息系统的动态性质,即随着它更成功地应对其运行环境中固有的复杂性,它会不断地进行修改。角色维度确定了四个主要类别,即设计者、专业用户、最终用户和利益相关者,从中又可以确定几个子类别。时间维度朝着信息系统的相对稳定有四个主要阶段。结构维度区分了战略、战术或组织以及操作层面,而这些层面在当前方法中常常被混淆在一起,存在稀释风险。人们认为,这个框架和方法可以为未来评估方法的标准化提供基础。

相似文献

2
Evaluation: salvation or nemesis of medical informatics?评估:医学信息学的救赎还是报应?
Comput Biol Med. 2002 May;32(3):113-25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00009-4.
4
Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges.卫生信息系统评估——问题与挑战
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Sep;71(2-3):125-35. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00131-x.
6
Evaluation in health informatics: computer simulation.健康信息学中的评估:计算机模拟
Comput Biol Med. 2002 May;32(3):151-64. doi: 10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00012-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验