Wu Tsu-Yin, Pender Nola, Yang Ke-Ping
School of Nursing, Eastern Michigan University, Michigan, USA.
J Nurs Res. 2002 Mar;10(1):57-64. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347583.62586.5a.
The purpose of this paper is to present a comparative analysis of the determinants of physical activity among adolescents in Taiwan and in the United States. Pender's Health Promotion Model (HPM) served as the theoretical framework for both studies (Pender, 1996). The major determinants of health behavior in the HPM are perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, activity-related affect, interpersonal influences, situational influences, commitment to a plan of action, and immediate competing demands. In Taiwan, 969 middle school students (55% males; 45% females) from Taipei provided data for the study. In the United States, the sample was collected from 286 late elementary and middle school students (48% males; 52% females). Results showed the gender differences in activity levels were apparent in the youths from both countries. In both Taiwanese and American youths, boys were more active than girls. Cross-cultural differences in the importance of barriers to physical activity emerged. Among Taiwanese adolescents, barriers did not emerge as a significant direct predictor of physical activity as they did among US adolescents. Perceived efficacy directly predicted physical activity among Taiwanese youths while it indirectly predicted physical activity and appeared to be mediated by beliefs regarding exercise benefits and barriers among American youths. In addition, the paths of effect for interpersonal influences were different when Taiwanese and US youths were compared. The findings from this paper have important and culturally-relevant information that can inform future physical activity intervention studies with diverse adolescents.
本文旨在对台湾和美国青少年身体活动的决定因素进行比较分析。彭德的健康促进模型(HPM)作为两项研究的理论框架(彭德,1996年)。HPM中健康行为的主要决定因素包括感知利益、感知障碍、自我效能、与活动相关的情感、人际影响、情境影响、对行动计划的承诺以及即时竞争需求。在台湾,来自台北的969名中学生(55%为男性;45%为女性)为该研究提供了数据。在美国,样本来自286名小学高年级和中学生(48%为男性;52%为女性)。结果显示,两国青少年的活动水平存在明显的性别差异。在台湾和美国的青少年中,男孩都比女孩更活跃。身体活动障碍重要性方面出现了跨文化差异。在台湾青少年中,障碍并未像在美国青少年中那样成为身体活动的显著直接预测因素。感知效能直接预测台湾青少年的身体活动,而在美国青少年中,它间接预测身体活动,且似乎通过关于运动益处和障碍的信念起中介作用。此外,比较台湾和美国青少年时,人际影响效应的路径有所不同。本文的研究结果具有重要且与文化相关的信息,可为未来针对不同青少年的身体活动干预研究提供参考。