Gardiner M D, Faux S, Jones L E
Rehabilitation Medicine, Calvary Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Mar 10;24(4):219-25. doi: 10.1080/09638280110073705.
In an attempt to find a more clinically useful functional outcome measure specifically tailored for lower limb amputees undergoing inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation, a 6-month prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability for Harold Wood-Stanmore Mobility Scale Data, including two handicap scales, was undertaken. An analysis of the data is presented in this paper.
An inter-rater reliability study was undertaken using four observers to complete admission and discharge scores for the three disability/handicap scales on 14 consecutive patients over 6 months.
The disability mobility scale demonstrated perfect observer agreement on admission and at discharge the inter-rater reliability for this measure was high (0.83). By contrast, reliability between observers for admission scores on the handicap mobility scale was poor at 0.49 but reasonably high on discharge (0.83). On admission, inter-rater reliability for handicap physical independence was very low (0.15). At discharge, reliability improved to 0.69 being more consistent with results achieved for the other axes.
This study confirms the good inter-rater reliability demonstrated previously in the literature but reveals poor inter-rater reliability for the two handicap scales. The latter will require modification before they can be used with confidence in conjunction with the disability scale.
为了找到一种更具临床实用性、专门为接受住院假肢康复的下肢截肢者量身定制的功能结局测量方法,对哈罗德·伍德 - 斯坦莫尔活动量表数据(包括两个残疾评定量表)进行了为期6个月的评分者间信度前瞻性评估。本文展示了对这些数据的分析。
进行了一项评分者间信度研究,由四名观察者为14名连续患者在6个月内完成三个残疾/残疾评定量表的入院和出院评分。
残疾活动量表在入院时显示出观察者间的完全一致性,出院时该测量方法的评分者间信度较高(0.83)。相比之下,残疾评定活动量表入院评分的观察者间信度较差,为0.49,但出院时相当高(0.83)。入院时,残疾身体独立性的评分者间信度非常低(0.15)。出院时,信度提高到0.69,与其他维度的结果更一致。
本研究证实了先前文献中显示的良好评分者间信度,但揭示了两个残疾评定量表的评分者间信度较差。在能够与残疾量表一起放心使用之前,后者需要进行修改。